This is the fifth insolvency plea to be filed against SpiceJet by a lessor
In May 2023, the NCLT's Mumbai bench refused to entertain IDBI's plea noting that it was barred under Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The case is likely to come up for hearing again on August 21.
Addressing customer claims during insolvency is not a straightforward matter as the IBC provides a mechanism to resolve insolvencies, but does not explicitly outline the treatment of customer claims, such as refunds for cancelled tickets.
In May 2023, the NCLT at Mumbai refused to entertain IDBI's plea noting that it was barred under Section 10A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
During the hearing, Go First said it has to refund Rs 597 crore to 15.5 lakh passengers since its grounding on May 3. This includes advances bookings also till July 10.
Recalling a judgment refers to canceling or reversing a judgement of the court mostly due to wrong interpretation of facts or procedural errors.
The court also rejected Maran's challenge to the arbitral award. Maran had requested to invalidate the portion of the award that included the interest on the amount of Rs 270 crore for the non-issuance of compulsory redeemable preference shares.
The move is being seen as another step towards the resumption of operations after NCLT refused to stop the debt-laden airline from using leased aircraft
The bill seeks to decriminalise 183 provisions in 42 different laws, replacing imprisonment with a monetary penalty. This should go a long way in decluttering the courts and expedite resolution.
The order was passed in an application filed by SMBC alleging that Go First violated the previous order of Delhi High Court as it had 'handled' the aircraft against explicit directions of the court.
JKC argued that it had obtained the Air Operator's Certificate (AoC) for one year from 2022-23, however, since the CoC objected to the transfer of ownership at every stage, they could not commence operations
The parliamentary panel also emphasised that ex-ante evaluation is to ensure that digital markets do not end up being monopolised.
The committee in its 63rd report has noted that the government had earlier informed that the digital competition law would be finalised by May 2023, however the deliberations are ongoing.
Centre had sought an extension of Mishra's term till October 15, since his presence would be required for the ongoing Financial Action Task Force (FATF) peer review
SEBI has now been directed to place the case for hearing before a Whole Time Member (WTM) or any other authorised officer who is higher in rank, grade or position to the WTM.
CCI initiated investigation against cement companies in 2019 after it received information from multiple sources regarding abnormal increase of cement prices in India. The parties alleged that the cement companies were colluding to artificially increase the price
An explanation of Article 370, which accorded special status to Jammu and Kashmir, why it was abrogated, and how the issue reached the apex court.
The plea, which came up for hearing before the principal bench of NCLT on July 26, has now been adjourned to the first week of August for further hearing
The POCSO law came after a long struggle to foreground the abuse of minors. But a big disappointment has been its inordinately high age of consent, pegged at 18, that doesn’t factor in teenage sexuality. This has led to wanton criminalisation and assaults on the autonomy of adolescents
The NCLT also dismissed the plea by lessors to inspect their aircraft and engine and held that they have in their previous order from June 15 already directed the Resolution Professional to maintain the same.
According to the order, which Moneycontrol has reviewed, Coffee Day obtained various credit facilities from IndusInd bank from April 2018
The appeal was closed as Indiabulls and Vivek Infracon, the company for which Chandra had stood personal guarantee for a loan of Rs 170 crore from Indiabulls, settled their dispute
According to the application filed in NCLT by Delhivery, the airline received over Rs 1.58 crore from the logistics company for rendering domestic cargo consignment services but never acted on it
Objecting to the plea, the lessors argued that the airline's resolution professional, who is already a party to the proceedings, represents the interest of the CoC. The lessors thus argued that CoC need not be made party