The Supreme Court of India is the apex supreme judicial body, which has the power of judicial review. It consists of a maximum of 34 judges and the Chief Justice of India is the head and chief judge of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court settles disputes between various government authorities as well as the central government vs state governments. Also, being the advisory court, the apex court hears matters which may specifically be referred to it under the constitution by the President of India. On January 28, 1950, the Supreme Court replaced both the Federal Court of India and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which were then at the apex of the Indian court system. The Supreme Court moved to its present premises in 1958 and the first Chief Justice of India was H J Kania. It was constituted as per Chapter IV of the Part V of Constitution of India. Former President Dr Rajendra Prasad laid the foundation stone of the Supreme Court's building on October 29, 1954. Designed in an Indo-British style by the chief architect Ganesh Bhikaji Deolalikar, the Supreme Court has a 27.6 metre high dome and a spacious colonnaded verandah. Apart from this, two new wings – the East Wing and the West Wing – were added to the complex in 1979. Also, a black bronze sculpture of 210 cm height was installed in the lawn of the complex in 1980, portraying Mother India in the form of the figure of a lady. This sculpture is just behind the statue of Mahatma Gandhi. According to Article 124 of the Constitution, a citizen of India not exceeding 65 years of age can be a judge if he or she has served as a judge of one high court or more for over 5 years or been an advocate for at least 10 years. Since February 5, 2018, the Supreme Court has decided to follow a new roster system for allocation of matters to judges. The current incumbent Chief Justice of India is NV Ramana who took office on April 24, 2021. More
A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi has taken suo motu cognisance of the ”objectionable” statements about the judiciary in NCERT textbooks
In April, a nine-judge bench will hear a review of the 2018 Sabarimala verdict that deemed as unconstitutional the prohibition of entry of women in their “menstruating years” into the temple. But at stake are questions that extend well beyond this temple or even a single religion
President Donald Trump criticised the Supreme Court, saying its recent ruling unintentionally expanded his authority on tariffs and licensing, while warning of future decisions he believes could harm US interests.
The currency rose after the US Supreme Court struck down tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, who subsequently slapped a 15% tariff on all trading partners
President Donald Trump can still impose tariffs despite the Supreme Court striking down his emergency powers, using Section 301, 122, 232, and potentially Depression-era Section 338 authorities, according to experts.
US President Donald Trump accused the Supreme Court of being influenced by “foreign interests” after it struck down his authority to impose sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
The Supreme Court blocked President Trump’s emergency tariffs, ruling he exceeded authority, raising questions over trade stability and potential economic fallout ahead of the election, as Democrats and Republicans weigh political implications.
The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s emergency tariffs under IEEPA, putting $175 billion in collections at risk of refunds, while Treasury plans for reimbursement and alternative tariff measures.
Referring to the tradition of mosque announcements for ‘sehri’ and ‘iftar’, Khanna said the practice originated when clocks were not common and people estimated time by the position of the sun
The Supreme Court of India granted regular bail to Vikram Bhatt and Shwetambari Bhatt in a fraud case filed by Rajasthan Police, offering temporary relief amid financial misappropriation allegations.
YouTuber Elvish Yadav was arrested for the alleged use of snake venom at a rave party in Noida.
The real damage from SC’s ruling on spectrum is not recoveries but the caution on lending to telcos now
A Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant expressed grave concern over the growing use of AI in court filings without proper authentication.
The Court’s observations form part of broader concerns within the judiciary on how artificial intelligence was beginning to shape legal work.
The plea alleged discriminatory remarks by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.
Abu Salem’s counsel argued that he had completed the 25-year incarceration period when remission earned for good conduct was factored in.
Central to the dispute is Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, which amends Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act under which personal information could be disclosed if it bore a relationship to public activity or was justified by a larger public interest.
"Except facilitating the builders in default, this institution is doing nothing. Better abolish this institution, we don't mind that," CJI Surya Kant made scathing remarks on RERA on Thursday.
You cannot denigrate a section of society by using such a title, the Supreme Court remarked on Thursday while rapping filmmaker Neeraj Pandey on his film 'Ghooskhor Pandat'.
The shrine at the centre of the controversy is linked to 14th century Sufi saint Hazrat Shaikh Alauddin Ansari, also called Ladle Mashaik, as well as 15th-century Hindu saint Raghava Chaitanya.
The bench led by CJI Kant said that the limited purpose of the case was to ensure that vacant posts were filled, not to scrutinise the internal deliberations of the selection committee.
Over the past two weeks, notices have been issued to at least seven foreign venture capital and private equity funds.
Imran Khan’s lawyer Salman Safdar met him in Adiala Jail after Supreme Court orders, said he was fit, and will submit a report limited to Khan’s living conditions soon there.
The post, shared of February 7, was deleted by the BJP after it received widespread outrage and condemnation.
The apex court, however, categorically stated that it was open to suggestions to ensure genuine voters are not left out of the process. The bench also allowed the deadline for scrutiny of documents to be extended by a week in West Bengal.