The Supreme Court of India is the apex supreme judicial body, which has the power of judicial review. It consists of a maximum of 34 judges and the Chief Justice of India is the head and chief judge of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court settles disputes between various government authorities as well as the central government vs state governments. Also, being the advisory court, the apex court hears matters which may specifically be referred to it under the constitution by the President of India. On January 28, 1950, the Supreme Court replaced both the Federal Court of India and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which were then at the apex of the Indian court system. The Supreme Court moved to its present premises in 1958 and the first Chief Justice of India was H J Kania. It was constituted as per Chapter IV of the Part V of Constitution of India. Former President Dr Rajendra Prasad laid the foundation stone of the Supreme Court's building on October 29, 1954. Designed in an Indo-British style by the chief architect Ganesh Bhikaji Deolalikar, the Supreme Court has a 27.6 metre high dome and a spacious colonnaded verandah. Apart from this, two new wings – the East Wing and the West Wing – were added to the complex in 1979. Also, a black bronze sculpture of 210 cm height was installed in the lawn of the complex in 1980, portraying Mother India in the form of the figure of a lady. This sculpture is just behind the statue of Mahatma Gandhi. According to Article 124 of the Constitution, a citizen of India not exceeding 65 years of age can be a judge if he or she has served as a judge of one high court or more for over 5 years or been an advocate for at least 10 years. Since February 5, 2018, the Supreme Court has decided to follow a new roster system for allocation of matters to judges. The current incumbent Chief Justice of India is NV Ramana who took office on April 24, 2021. More
On November 3, the Patna High Court dismissed her petition against the rejection of her nomination papers from the Mohania reserved constituency in Kaimur district.
The apex court said that it will heat the pleas on November 14.
A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih delivered the judgment in the Mihir Rajesh Shah vs State of Maharashtra case that arose from the high-profile Mumbai BMW hit-and-run incident of July 2024.
The Supreme Court also observed that the cinema industry is witnessing a decline and cautioned that if multiplexes fail to make ticket prices more reasonable, their halls could soon be empty.
The accused, a Superintendent of Police (SP), was alleged to have had sexual relations with a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) under a false promise to wed her, according to a report by Bar and Bench.
"The law is being thrust upon boys. We should spread awareness among boys and men about the legal provisions," said the Supreme Court.
The matter was taken up by a division bench headed by outgoing Chief Justice BR Gavai, who is set to demit office on November 23. The bench, while declining to proceed immediately, said the petition would be taken up again after four weeks, the report said.
In an interim order on September 15, the top court put on hold a few key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
The supreme court is expected to deliberate on possible enforcement mechanisms and policy reforms to address the large-scale non-compliance of motor insurance in India.
Referring to a Supreme Court judgment, the High Court highlighted the importance of distinguishing between consensual sex and rape.
Two aspects of the interim order have triggered debate. One, the decision to transfer the case to CBI when jurisprudence has set a high bar to do so. Two, the decision to appoint two IPS officers to the supervisory committee who may be of Tamil Nadu cadre but not natives of the state
A government official said Vodafone Idea will have to formally communicate the kind of relief it is seeking once the court issues its directive
The top court on October 27 said that any decision on granting relief to Vodafone Idea falls within the government’s policy domain
The top court directs chief secretary of states and UTs, other than West Bengal and Telangana, to appear before it on November 3 at 10.30 am.
Traditionally, the outgoing CJI receives the request for recommendation about a month before demitting office upon reaching the age of 65.
The letter asking Justice Gavai to name his successor is set to be delivered either this evening or on Friday, people aware of the procedure to appoint Supreme Court and high court judges told PTI.
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta dismissed the state's plea against the October 9 order of the Telangana High Court
Laws, judgments, and penalties can only go so far unless accompanied by a strong administrative will to eradicate this inhuman practice once and for all. The sight of a worker entering a sewer outside the Supreme Court is not just a failure of governance; it is a collective failure of conscience
The 70-year-old Bhupati is known to be one of the brains behind the extremist movement. Other insurgents who surrendered include two State zonal committee members, 10 divisional committee members and cadres from Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh.
Roche moved the apex court after Delhi High Court allowed Natco Pharma to launch Risdiplam drug
Bursting of traditional firecrackers add to the smog in Delhi-NCR, caused widely due to stubble burning and vehicles.
Last month, the Supreme Court heard the case and allowed certified manufacturers to produce green crackers, while maintaining the restriction on their sale in the banned Delhi-NCR region
A five-judge Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices M M Sundresh, Aravind Kumar, S C Sharma and K Vinod Chandran delivered two separate judgements to hold that judicial officers of subordinate judiciary are entitled to become district judges under direct recruitment process meant for advocates only.
The Supreme Court was responding to submissions in connection with the Bihar SIR, stating that the 3.66 lakh voters deleted in the final list – in addition to the 65 lakh removed in the draft list – had not been individually informed.
The YouTuber's video, which also included remarks about the judge’s Dalit-Ambedkarite background, has since gone viral, drawing sharp criticism for its tone and content.