-
Jane Street had moved SAT last week alleging that Sebi did not provide complete inspection of documents to the firm in connection to the interim ex-parte order passed against the trader.
-
Total pending cases in SAT stood at 1,121 in 2024 against 736 in 2023 and 842 in 2022
-
Linde India had challenged in the Supreme Court an SAT order, which rejected the company's appeal. The appeal pertains to staying a valuation exercise ordered by SEBI in regard to related party transactions.
-
Addressing the gathering, CJI Chandrachud stressed that robust legal protection and effective dispute resolution mechanisms are crucial for attracting investments and driving economic outcomes such as capital formation and job creation.
-
In August, SEBI passed an order revising the directions it had given to ZEEL's former directors Subhash Chandra and Punit Goenka, asking its investigating officials to complete the enquiry in eight months
-
SEBI’s lawyer tried to convince the court stating that the appeal was filed considering the question of law involved and not just the penalty.
-
The Cafe Coffee Day, in its exchange filing, attached a SAT order dated March 3 which noted that the imposition of penalty will remain stayed till the appeal remains pending before the tribunal.
-
The appellate tribunal has said SEBI must comply with its orders and the precedents set unless they are set aside. This should bring relief to several parties contesting cases
-
Sebi had found these entities to be involved in a fraudulent scheme of misrepresentation of financial statements of Bombay Dyeing by inflating sales of Rs 2,492.94 crore and profit of Rs 1,302.20 crore arising from the alleged sale of flats by Bombay Dyeing to Scal Services Ltd, a Wadia Group company
-
"The period to deposit the money by our order dated 11th April, 2022 is extended for a further period of four weeks,” the appellate tribunal said in an order passed on May 31.
-
-
According to SEBI, lapses were found in the manner in which six debt funds were suddenly wound up by Franklin Templeton in April 2020.
-
In the biggest-ever penalty in a single case, Sebi, in February, had imposed penalties on DLF, its top executives, their family members and various other related entities for entering into "sham transactions".
-
The realty bellwether DLF which is under the scanner of a number of regulators and will face the scrutiny at the hands of the Apex Court today. The court will hear a petition filed by DLF to challenge the CCI order.
-
The rise in debt was basically because of decrease in sales and the profits too were eaten up by higher interest burden, said Ashok Tyagi, Group CFO, DLF.
-
In its order in January this year, Sebi had prohibited Angel Broking from taking up new assignments for a period of two weeks and had cancelled the NCJ Share's registration for a period of one week for violating broker norms.
-
Earlier this month the company had said that Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had advised it to approach Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) for seeking any relief, including extension of time.
-
International Paper corp (IPC) is in talks with bankers to explore options to delist AP Paper Mills.
-
Here are the top headlines that made news today.
-
Sebi takes action against promoters of Gillette India for non-ompliance to minimum public holding norms. Sebi today ordered freezing all corporate benefitsarising out of their stake in the company.
-
It is getting really ugly between Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and Sahara. For Sahara and Subrata Roy the blows just keep on coming.
-
The final hearing on Subrata Roy's plea is going to take place at the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). This is after market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India‘s (Sebi‘s) attachment order on Subrata Roy‘s bank accounts and other assets came, along with those of two group firms and their top executives.
-
Looking to address the increasing menace of insider trading activities, market regulator Sebi today set up a 16-member committee to suggest new rules, which will replace nearly two-decade old set of norms.
-
The markets watchdog SEBI today told SAT that Section 55 A of the Companies Act gives it enough powers to regulate unlisted companies if such entities have raised funds from the public.
-
On the third day of hearing of the SEBI versus Sahara case, Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) asked Sahara Group to furnish details on mode used for raising funds, amount raised and also the number of investors.
