Chris Murphy, witness to Sandy Hook’s pain, slams fellow senators: 'Why are you here?'

Gustavo Garcia-Siller, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, comforts people as they react outside the Ssgt Willie de Leon Civic Center, where students had been transported from Robb Elementary School after a shooting. Mass shootings in America have frequently led to public protests and calls for stricter background checks on gun sales and other firearm controls common in other countries, but such measures have repeatedly failed in the face of strong Republican-led opposition. (Source: Reuters)

Anushka Patil

Senator Chris Murphy was a young U.S. representative from Connecticut when he stood at a firehouse in 2012 with families from his district as they learned that their children, all first graders, had been shot dead at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

On Tuesday, nearly 10 years later, he stood on the Senate floor in anguish as yet another American city learned that children in an elementary school had been gunned down.

Also Read | Teenage gunman kills 18 children at Texas elementary school

“What are we doing?! What are we doing?!” Murphy demanded of his colleagues, imploring them to take action on gun control.

“Why do you spend all this time running for the United States Senate — why do you go through all the hassle of getting this job, of putting yourself in a position of authority — if your answer is that as this slaughter increases, as our kids run for their lives, we do nothing?”

His voice at times strained in anger as he confronted his fellow senators with the grief and frustration of a nation that has seen mass shooting after mass shooting with little congressional action: “What are we doing?” he asked. “Why are you here if not to solve a problem as existential as this?”

In Pics | Deadly shooting at Texas elementary school

Murphy’s address on the Senate floor was viewed hundreds of thousands of times on social media in the hours after 19 children, a teacher and another adult were killed in Uvalde, Texas. It is the deadliest elementary school shooting in the United States since Sandy Hook, which changed the course of Murphy’s career.

He took office in the Senate less than a month after he watched those parents in Newtown, Connecticut, learn that their children were not coming home, and spent the next decade trying and failing to enact gun safety bills.

“I have this very deep sense,” he said, “that I will see my time in public service as a failure if I don’t meet the expectations of those parents in Sandy Hook, and Hartford and Bridgeport.”

Also Read | ‘It’s almost like an instant replay.’ Newtown parents grapple with another school shooting

Murphy, who holds an “F” rating with the NRA, told The New York Times last week that he rejected the notion that his crusade is hopeless — that if 20 elementary schoolchildren being murdered in Newtown didn’t transform American gun laws, nothing would.

“That’s fundamentally the wrong way to look at how Washington works,” he said. “There are few epiphanies here. It’s all about political power, and political muscle, and we’re in the process of building our own.”

Still, some of his speech on the Senate floor Tuesday attempted to elicit a change of heart in his colleagues.

Also Read | Democrats moved quickly to clear the way for votes on legislation to strengthen background checks for gun purchasers

Children who returned to school at Sandy Hook after the shooting had to be taught a safe word to use when they were reliving moments from the attack, like stepping over their classmates’ bodies as they fled, Murphy said.

“In one classroom, that word was ‘monkey,’ ” he recounted, describing how teachers would then talk the children through their flashbacks. “And over and over and over through the day, kids would stand up and yell, ‘Monkey!’ ”

Also Read | Biden calls on Americans to stand up to the gun lobby after Texas school massacre

“Why?” Murphy exclaimed. “Why are we here if not to try to make sure that fewer schools and fewer communities go through what Sandy Hook has gone through? What Uvalde is going through?”

c.2022 The New York Times Company