The IAMAI argued that the clause is too ambiguous for developers working with large datasets that may include scraped or publicly posted information.
PhonePe CEO Sameer Nigam and Razorpay CEO Harshil Mathur have also been elected to the governing council, which in the past has been accused of toeing the line of 'big tech' firms
IAMAI pushed back against potential restrictions on cross-border data transfers, stating that such measures could isolate Indian companies from the global data economy
To recap, in April 2023, a controversy erupted when IAMAI, whose members include both Indian companies and large foreign companies, argued against the need for a separate digital competition framework
The industry body also said that the criteria for designating enterprises as Systematically Significant Digital Enterprises (SSDEs) can potentially include the entirety of the Indian digital sector
On March 1, Google delisted over 100 apps of prominent Indian companies for not complying with the company's app billing policy for an extended period of time.
Murugavel J, founder and CEO of matrimony.com, said that only eight of the company's apps, including Bengali Matrimony, Marathi Matrimony, Tamil Matrimony, Jodii and Bharat Matrimony were reinstated on Sunday, but only after they accepted Google's terms.
In a letter addressed to Karnataka Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy, IAMAI stated that dynamic pricing is beneficial for both drivers and customers, ensuring fair compensation and improved services
MeitY's gaming rules are yet to be implemented. All code signatories have pledged to "undertake best efforts" to adopt the code's practices.
The Internet and Mobile Association of India’s request is in line with other industry bodies, which have maintained that several provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act would require technical, product, policy and process-level changes
During IAMAI's EGM on October 10, Members of the body's governing council also passed a resolution reserving the top 3 positions in the industry body for Indian companies
Industry bodies and civil society organisations say there is already enough regulation, and that it could stifle innovation and hinder economic growth.
The resolution also seeks to define what would be considered an Indian company to avoid ambiguity.
The GST Council's decision will be a huge blow to India’s ambitious target to achieve a $1 trillion digital economy by 2025, the industry body said.
According to sources, during the meeting which was held on June 14, governing council members held discussions on Big Tech, prioritising start-ups in Internet and Mobile Association's (IAMAI) charter and so on
The Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has cautioned that the rules will significantly impact consumer viewing experience, and "throttle creativity and artistic expression".
On May 25, industry body Internet and Mobile Association of India announced the results to its 24-member governing council, with homegrown companies winning all seats. Big Tech companies will have no representation in the governing council for the next two years
Rajesh Magow of MakeMyTrip will become the vice chairperson and Times Internet's Satyan Gajwani will be the Treasurer.
Sameer Nigam, the CEO of another IAMAI member company PhonePe has hit back at those opposing IAMAI's views on the matter, terming them as opportunistic.
This controversy will seemingly reach its climax when the results of the ongoing elections to IAMAI's governing council are announced later this month.
ASCI's report and IAMAI's comments will be encouraging for edtech companies like Byju's and Unacademy in India, which have come under fire over the last 12-15 months for alleged mis-selling of courses and overstating outcomes.
This comes at a time when the industry body has been accused of "parroting" views of Big Tech companies
A few companies and personalities from the Indian startup ecosystem disagree with IAMAI's position, claiming that they support such a law and that Big Tech companies influenced the industry body's opposition.
The industry body's stance on the matter comes despite the opposition it faced from the Indian entrepreneurial ecosystem.
This comes at a time when the industry body has been accused of "parroting" views of Big Tech companies