Producer Abhishek Agarwal lauds Ministry of broadcasting's decision to submit films in Indian sign language

The Indian film industry, popularly known as Bollywood and Tollywood, has been an integral part of the country's cultural fabric, serving as a primary source of entertainment for millions. With its reach expanding globally, Indian cinema has begun to take steps toward inclusivity, ensuring that its content is accessible to a broader audience. In a move hailed as both progressive and necessary, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has mandated that all films submitted for censorship must now include accessibility features such as subtitles, audio descriptions, and closed captions. This directive, effective from September 1, 2024, aims to make cinema more inclusive for individuals with hearing and visual impairments.

 
Abhishek Agarwal, a prominent Tollywood producer known for his work on films such as "Kashmir Files" and "Tiger Nageswara Rao," has expressed strong support for this decision. Agarwal has been a vocal advocate for the inclusion of accessibility features in films, recognizing the need to cater to the nearly eight million visually impaired individuals in India alone. In his view, this move is not just about inclusivity but also about foresight and the potential for expanding the audience base for Indian films.

 
Agarwal has already set a precedent in Tollywood by incorporating Indian Sign Language into his films. He shares that his team screened "Kashmir Files" for visually challenged viewers, who responded positively to the experience. Building on this success, Agarwal went a step further with "Tiger Nageswara Rao," ensuring that the film was censored in Indian Sign Language. This was a pioneering effort in the industry, and it set a benchmark for other filmmakers to follow.

 
The Hyderabad censor office played a crucial role in this process, cooperating with Agarwal's team to issue a certification after 30 days of meticulous review. This effort underscores the challenges and the time required to adapt films to meet accessibility standards, particularly when dealing with sign language and audio descriptions.

 
While the inclusion of accessibility features is a step forward for the industry, it is not without its challenges. Agarwal points out that there are relatively few companies in India capable of altering audio for sign language or providing closed captioning and audio descriptions. This scarcity of resources could lead to increased costs for filmmakers. Agarwal estimates that the cost of adding these features could range from Rs 40 to 50 lakhs per film.

 
However, despite the financial implications, Agarwal remains optimistic about the long-term benefits. He argues that catering to the specially challenged audience could significantly increase the viewership and profitability of films. For example, even if just 10% of the eight million visually impaired individuals in India were to watch a film in theaters, it could add 80 lakhs to the audience base, boosting box office collections and helping producers to recoup their investments.

 
Moreover, Agarwal highlights the potential for increased revenue through digital platforms like OTT services, which have a global reach. By making films accessible to audiences worldwide, producers can tap into new markets, increasing their films' visibility and profitability.

 
The mandate from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting marks a significant step toward making Indian cinema more inclusive. However, its successful implementation will depend on the industry's willingness to adapt to these new requirements and invest in the necessary resources. Agarwal's efforts in this regard have set an example, but it will take a collective effort from filmmakers, producers, and industry stakeholders to bring about meaningful change.