The High Court of Delhi was established on 31st October, 1966. At first, it exercised jurisdiction not only over the Union Territory of Delhi, but also Himachal Pradesh, until 1971. Currently, the sanctioned strength of Judges of the High Court of Delhi is 45 permanent Judges and 15 Additional Judges. More
A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela asked the authorities’ counsel to take instructions on the issue and inform it at 2:30 pm.
Despite her anguish, the survivor said she still believed in the judicial process and would approach the Supreme Court.
According to the PIL, only a small fraction of India’s estimated 30,000–40,000 used vehicle dealers have been registered under the authorised dealer framework. In Delhi, not a single dealer has obtained registration, the petitioner claimed.
Dhurandhar cleared a major hurdle as the Delhi High Court disposed of Major Mohit Sharma’s family’s petition seeking a stay, allowing the much-awaited action thriller to proceed toward its scheduled release without restrictions.
Apple has also challenged the amendment to the Competition Act, 2002, which allows CCI to impose penalties based on a company’s global turnover.
Dhurandhar faces a last-minute setback as Major Mohit Sharma’s family moves the Delhi High Court, alleging the film mirrors his life without consent and seeking an urgent stay on its release.
The High Court passed the order on a plea challenging the summons issued by a trial court against Gambhir, his wife, mother and the foundation and seeking quashing of the criminal complaint.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition seeking to stop the release of 120 Bahadur, clearing the way for the Farhan Akhtar film on the Battle of Rezang La to release on November 21 as scheduled.
The dispute over Sunjay Kapur’s estate has escalated, with the Delhi High Court pressing Priya Kapur to explain why she is resisting inspection of the will she claims is his original document from March 21, 2025.
Actor-producer Ravi Mohan continues to face a setback with the usage of the title Bro Code for his upcoming film, which is backed by his production house Ravi Mohan studios. The use of the the title has been restrained by the Delhi High court. The banner cannot use, publish or promote the title Bro Code for the project. This order comes in days after Ravi Mohan Studios secured a win in the Madras High Court.
It said the only defence taken by the woman was that the property was purchased from her funds, which she got from her parents and relatives at the time of marriage,
Justice Datta reportedly said, “If you [FSSAI] are unable to do it, you move an application. I contemplate passing orders to restrain the manufacturers from manufacturing.”
The incident reportedly took place on Tuesday and the court was not in session and people were waiting for the Judge to come.
The matter arose out of a petition filed by Sharma Trading Company, a distributor of M/s Hindustan Unilever Limited, challenging the proceedings initiated against it by the National Anti-Profiteering Authority in 2018.
Section 11(1)(b) of the Trademarks Act bars the registration of a trademark that is deceptively similar to an already existing one for identical or related goods.
The court directed the Samajwadi Party Media Cell and another defendant to remove specific URLs within 24 hours, failing which X (formerly Twitter) must take them down within 72 hours.
The bench's order came on an appeal filed by Patanjali against a single judge's order of the high court, restraining it from running "disparaging" advertisements against Dabur Chyawanprash.
The court said a soft copy of the menu has been forwarded on the WhatsApp of the police official who will ensure the quality of the pizza was the same as claimed in the menu.
The Court also held that the State cannot compel a woman to endure trauma solely for the preservation of unborn life, as such compulsion would effectively undermine her fundamental rights by placing them secondary to rigid biological standards.
The suspect is believed to have been sending threat emails in Mumbai and surrounding areas for the past few months, all of which have turned out to be hoaxes.
The police said they have checked the court premises as per the Standard operating procedure and found it to be a hoax till now.
This comes as a major security scare gripped the Delhi High Court on Friday after an email threat warning of a bomb in and around the court premises led to panic and disruption of proceedings.
The Delhi High Court has issued notice on Karisma Kapoor’s children Samaira and Kiaan’s plea seeking their rightful share in late industrialist Sunjay Kapur’s Rs 30,000 crore estate.
“The probative value of the evidence against the Appellants Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid, prima facie and at this stage, cannot be branded as weak,” the court said in the order running 133 pages.
Tasleem Ahmed's case was separated from others on the request of his counsel.