How government employees can compare NPS and UPS through this new platform for retirement planning

Representative image

A new device by a government-sponsored body is assisting central and state government staff to assess whether the National Pension System (NPS) or the Old Pension Scheme (UPS) provides superior financial returns at the time of retirement. The tool offers side-by-side comparison of retirement earnings under both schemes, enabling staff with the information necessary for long-term choices.

Why the comparison is important today

The announcement has been made in the face of increasing opposition among public sector employees regarding the sufficiency of NPS. Several states, such as Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh, have already been in touch with the Central government about reverting to the Old Pension Scheme. As pressure mounts in other states as well as at the centre, the tool is being viewed as a reaction to increasing demands for pension reform.

How the tool works

Employees enter major parameters like age, salary now, years of service expected, and dearness allowance percentages. The calculator then computes approximate NPS and UPS pension payments based on market-linked returns for NPS and the payout formula for UPS and presents a side-by-side comparison of monthly pension payouts, tax effect, and inflationary adjustments.

The inherent NPS and UPS differences

The Old Pension Scheme offers 50% of the basic salary drawn at retirement as pension, with regular cost-of-living increases. It is a defined-benefit scheme. The NPS, however, is a market-linked, defined-contribution model, with returns based on investment returns. While NPS is portable and fiscally sustainable for governments, employees are concerned about its volatility.

Response of unions and financial experts

Employee unions greeted the new tool as a necessary measure towards transparency. Most government employees, particularly those nearing retirement, have been upset by the ambiguity in pension settlements under NPS. Economists caution that the return en masse to UPS would impose substantial fiscal burdens on the state and central governments in the long term.

Fiscal implications of a shift to UPS

While UPS guarantees income, its detractors say it can threaten long-term budget health by setting off unsustainable pension burdens. Pension commitments could balloon, leaving less money for development or welfare expenditures if numerous states adopt the return to UPS, policy analysts say.

Looking ahead

Already accessible to employees in some states and central ministries, it will be expanded in the coming months. There will also be an integration with employee HRMS systems to enable real-time pension planning. With India set for a wave of public sector retirees in the coming years, the tool has the potential to become a primary guide through one of the most important financial decisions an employee will ever make.