Are small savings schemes better than fixed deposits? A return and reliability perspective

Representative image

Given the change in interest rates, Indian savers wonder if small savings schemes or fixed deposits by banks are a better option where returns are concerned. The answer is based on your investment horizon, tenure, and tax implications.

Interest rate comparison

Bank fixed deposits (FDs) have been the favourite of risk-averse Indian investors for years. FDs provide assured returns, regular income, and flexible terms. But government-guaranteed small savings schemes such as Public Provident Fund (PPF), National Savings Certificate (NSC), Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS), and the Post Office Monthly Income Scheme (POMIS) can return higher post-tax income, particularly for long-term savers.

Bank FD interest rates are determined by specific banks and usually vary with the Reserve Bank of India's monetary policy. As of mid-2025, top banks are paying between 6.5% and 7.5% on fixed deposits for most terms. Senior citizens usually receive an extra 0.50%. Yet, FD interest is taxed fully in the investor's relevant income tax slab, and that really minimizes the net return for upper-bracket taxpayers. For instance, a person in the 30% bracket getting 7.5% from an FD will end up with only about 5.25% after tax.

Post-tax returns and tax advantages

Small savings schemes, on the other hand, provide interest rates notified by the government quarterly but typically remain static for long stretches of time. Today, the PPF provides a tax-free annual return of 7.1% under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act. That reason alone makes it an attractive choice for long-term investors. Senior Citizen Savings Scheme provides 8.2% interest per annum, payable quarterly, and is taxable but provides a ₹1.5 lakh annual exemption under Section 80C. The National Savings Certificate offers a return of 7.7%, compounded annually and paid at maturity, and although taxable, the interest can also be reinvested for tax deduction in future years.

Safety and risk factors

Another consideration is safety. Small savings schemes are backed by the government, i.e., they are some of the safest investment forms out there. Bank FDs are usually safe, but are covered only until ₹5 lakh per depositor per bank as per the DICGC guidelines. In the event of bank trouble or default, amounts over that may be in danger, though large-scale defaults are not common.

Liquidity and withdrawal flexibility

Liquidity is one place where fixed deposits have the upper hand. FDs can generally be encashed with a penalty, typically only 0.5% to 1% over the interest rate. Small savings schemes have longer lock-ins. PPF has a 15-year maturity and limited withdrawal facilities prior to that date. NSC and SCSS have five-year lock-ins, and premature withdrawals usually have harsh penalties or entail special conditions.

In summary, bank fixed deposits are still a handy and adjustable option for conservative investors at lower tax brackets. However, for higher tax payers or long-term needs like retirement or children's education, small savings instruments can provide superior post-tax yields as well as government guarantee. Diversification across both instruments can prove to be a safe strategy where liquidity requirements are met alongside returns and security.