The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, struck a deal with Google in 2022 to have the tech giant pay for training access to Wikipedia content
Crowdsourced, open edited and free, the site must seize the new technology as an opportunity
The online encyclopedia’s pageviews have dropped 8% year-on-year, as generative AI and social platforms reshape how people find information online.
Whether Grokipedia becomes a credible replacement or another Musk side project depends heavily on execution, transparency, and how it handles the unavoidable tension between knowledge, power, and trust.
The Wikimedia Foundation is the second major tech platform, following X, to become embroiled in Indian court battles over orders to take down content in recent years
The information posted on Wikipedia might also lead to unrest among his followers, the notice had mentioned
Distortion of history on open-source platforms such as Wikipedia would not be tolerated, he told reporters, replying to a question about some organizations in the state flagging the allegedly wrong information.
Wikipedia editors are facing serious threats as Elon Musk and the Heritage Foundation try to track and expose them. In response, Wikimedia is introducing new security measures to protect user identities and fight back against harassment. Here's what’s happening and how it could impact the future of Wikipedia.
An elated Elon Musk waved his right arm in a controversial manner during Donald Trump’s inauguration, with some historians and human rights groups interpreting it as a Nazi salute.
Elon Musk's original post in October 2023 criticised the Wikimedia Foundation's financial dealings and questioned the necessity of their funding.
Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that operates Wikipedia, said that the Foundation stands behind its community of volunteers and core values,
The Information and Broadcasting Ministry has raised concerns about editorial control on Wikipedia, suggesting that a small group manages its pages.
Everyone has a right to seek judicial remedy when their rights are violated. But by not suing the actual sources of publications and instead going after an encyclopedia that only cites these articles and threatening to ban it over contested opinions sets a concerning precedent
Wikipedia has reportedly failed to disclose information about editors who had made certain controversial edits to ANI’s Wiki page.
English Wikipedia raked in more than 84 billion views this year, according to numbers released on December 5 by the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit behind the free, publicly edited online encyclopedia. And the most popular article was about ChatGPT (yes, the AI chatbot that's seemingly everywhere today).
Elon Musk recently made headlines when he expressed his willingness to donate a billion dollars to Wikipedia, provided it underwent a name change.
Musk's Trumpian broadside asking why Wikipedia needed so much money was his latest attack against those disseminating credible information. Unlike X, Wikipedia articles are tightly edited by thousands of mostly volunteer editors. Its guiding principle requires citation for every stated fact ffrom a trusted, verifiable news source with recognised standards
Adani, a first-generation entrepreneur, has lost over USD 70 billion in net worth and slipped to 25th rank on the world billionaire index from being Asia's richest and the world's third most wealthy businessman, in less than a month.
Turning away the Wikimedia Foundation’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit based on the government’s assertion of what is called the state secrets privilege, a legal doctrine that can shut down litigation if disclosure of certain information would damage U.S. national security.
Anand Mahindra shared a tweet on the most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week in which Pathaan overtook the likes of ChatGPT and Last of Us to take the top spot.
The site was blocked on Friday by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, after a deadline expired that Pakistan gave to Wikipedia to remove the controversial content.
The Wikimedia Foundation was given a 48-hour deadline before the site was blocked in the country
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, gets a makeover. Find out how it changes user experience.
Vladimir Medeiko, director of Moscow-based Wikimedia RU, said the ruling would be appealed, adding that "no one will remove" the articles.
Minister of State in Electronics and Information Technology Rajeev Chandrasekhar said that if Wikipedia wishes to remain an intermediary in India, they have to be aligned with the country's goals of having 'safe and trusted internet'.