Moneycontrol PRO
HomeNewsTrendsLegalChintels Paradiso: Approach consumer forum SC tells residents of towers E, F & G

Chintels Paradiso: Approach consumer forum SC tells residents of towers E, F & G

The court, however, did not dismiss the case and proceeded to tag it with the the other Chintels cases pending before it. The cases are now likely to come up for hearing on September 4

August 28, 2023 / 14:56 IST
Chintels Paradiso, Supreme Court

Chintels Paradiso has been marred in controversy since February 2022, after two women were killed after the ceilings of several flats in tower D of the building collapsed.

The Supreme Court on August 28 advised the residents of towers E, F and G of Chintels Paradiso to approach the consumer forum rather the filing a writ petition before them.

The court, however, did not dismiss the case and proceeded to tag it with the other Chintels cases pending before it. The cases are now likely to come up for hearing on September 4.

Nearly 25 residents of towers E, F and G approached the apex court against the company and Gurugram authorities after the builder withdrew the offer to rebuild apartments at the same site. The company has also stopped paying rent for the residents after these towers were declared unsafe for occupation.

Chintels Paradiso has been marred in controversy since February 2022, after two women were killed after the ceilings of several flats in tower D of the building collapsed.

Following the collapse of the towers, besides the police, an investigation team from IIT-Delhi was asked to conduct a structural audit.

In November 2022, the Gurugram district administration ordered the demolition of Tower D after it was found unfit for habitation. The demolition order also noted that there was sagging in one of the balconies of Tower F and other signs of distress in various other flats of Towers E and F.

Subsequently, in June 2023, Tower G was also found to be unsafe for habitation.

Builder's offer

In April 2023, in a bid to settle with the homebuyers, the real estate company had held out two solutions:
(i) buyback of the property at the rate of Rs 6,500 per square feet (sq ft), or,
(ii) redevelopment of the flats at the same site.

However, the builder withdrew the offer on the grounds that there were no takers for the scheme.

Litigation in Supreme Court

A few residents of the society approached the Supreme Court in 2022. The apex court sought a response from the developer of Chintels Paradiso in November 2022. The case is currently pending.

Notably, the minor son of a woman who died in the collapse had approached the Supreme Court for recourse. However, the petition was recently withdrawn.

In July 2023, the Supreme Court upon being informed that the builder had stopped paying compensatory rent, sought the responses from the Gurugram administration and the builder.

S.N.Thyagarajan
Ashish Mishra
first published: Aug 28, 2023 02:17 pm

Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!

Advisory Alert: It has come to our attention that certain individuals are representing themselves as affiliates of Moneycontrol and soliciting funds on the false promise of assured returns on their investments. We wish to reiterate that Moneycontrol does not solicit funds from investors and neither does it promise any assured returns. In case you are approached by anyone making such claims, please write to us at grievanceofficer@nw18.com or call on 02268882347