Supreme Court asks Centre to decide on EPF wage ceiling revision within four months

Representative image

• Supreme Court asks Centre to review EPFO wage ceiling within four months
• Current Rs 15,000 ceiling unchanged for over a decade, excludes many workers
• Petitioner: Outdated cap denies social security to many workers

Did our AI summary help?

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Union government to take a fresh look at the long-pending revision of the wage ceiling under the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme and decide the issue within a fixed timeframe.

A Bench comprising Justices JK Maheshwari and AS Chandurkar issued the direction while disposing of a petition filed by social activist Naveen Prakash Nautiyal, who had questioned the continued applicability of the existing ceiling of Rs 15,000 per month.

The court noted that the ceiling, which determines eligibility for coverage under the EPFO, has remained unchanged for over a decade.

The plea highlighted that the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, which oversees social security benefits for organised sector workers, excludes employees earning more than the prescribed limit from the scheme. According to the petitioner, this exclusion defeats the very purpose of a welfare legislation meant to ensure financial security for workers.

Appearing for Nautiyal, advocates Pranav Sachdeva and Neha Rathi told the court that despite significant changes in wage structures across the country, the ceiling has not been updated for more than 11 years. They pointed out that minimum wages fixed by both the Centre and state governments in many cases exceed the current EPFO threshold, creating an anomaly.

Sachdeva argued that the stagnant ceiling has had serious consequences for workers, stating, “this has deprived the majority of workers of the benefits and protection of the EPFO scheme, which is essentially a social welfare scheme.” He submitted that large sections of the workforce are being kept out of the provident fund net due to the outdated cap.

The petition further claimed that employees earning above the ceiling are automatically excluded from the scheme, even though their income levels may still warrant social security coverage. This, it argued, results in arbitrary exclusion without any rational basis linked to economic realities.

While closing the matter, the Bench directed the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the central government within two weeks, along with a copy of the court’s order. The Centre, in turn, has been asked to consider and decide the representation within four months.

Nautiyal’s plea invoked Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, asserting that the manner in which the wage ceiling has been revised over the years is arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights. It challenged the lack of any structured mechanism or timeline for periodic revision under the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952, framed under the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petition underscored that revisions to the ceiling have historically been sporadic, with gaps of over a decade in some instances. It said there has been no consistent linkage with objective indicators such as inflation levels, minimum wage revisions, per capita income or the consumer price index.

“This erratic approach has resulted in the exclusion of large sections of the workforce, contrary to the object of providing social security to employees in the organised sector,” the plea stated. It also referred to institutional recommendations that have remained unimplemented. “The Public Accounts Committee of the 16th Lok Sabha and the EPFO's own Sub-Committee (2022) have both recommended periodic and rational revision of the ceiling, but despite approval by the Central Board (EPF) in July 2022, the Central Government has not acted upon these recommendations,” it added.

The petition relied on a statistical review of wage ceiling revisions over the past seven decades to argue that the exercise has not aligned with broader economic benchmarks such as minimum pay scales of central government employees, income tax thresholds, growth in per capita income or inflation trends.

“A statistical analysis of the revision in the wage ceiling over the last 70 years shows that it has not been consistent with any of the above-mentioned metrics,” the plea said, adding that the current limit of Rs 15,000 stands in stark contrast to prevailing wage realities in several regions.

According to the petitioner, the scheme has gradually shifted from an inclusive model in its early decades to an exclusionary one in recent years. “This is clearly reflected in the significant disparity between the number of workmen covered by the scheme at the time of its inception and the substantially reduced number of workmen covered by the scheme presently,” it said.

The plea also referred to the EPFO’s Sub-Committee on Enhancing Coverage and Managing Related Litigation, which in 2022 suggested lowering the entry threshold, raising the wage ceiling and ensuring automatic enrolment of employees up to that limit. “The said recommendation was approved by the Central Board (EPF) in July 2022. Recommendations of the Central Board (EPF) are pending consideration with the Central government,” it noted.