Nations can avoid conflict on Moon with safety zones and treaties

Nations can avoid conflict on the Moon through diplomacy, treaties and cooperation (Image: Canva)

As nations plan permanent bases, the Moon may become contested territory. Water ice and rare minerals are key resources attracting attention. Few locations are ideal for settlements, making them highly strategic.

Existing Treaties Set Some Ground Rules

The 1967 Outer Space Treaty forbids countries from claiming ownership. Space must be used for peaceful purposes benefiting all nations. The Artemis Accords provide guidance for resource extraction without land ownership.

Safety Zones Aim To Prevent Conflict

Artemis Accords suggest temporary zones around mining and exploration sites. These zones are meant to prevent interference and accidental collisions. However, critics argue zones could resemble de facto territorial claims.

Legal Gaps Leave Room For Tension

Not all major spacefaring nations have signed the Moon Agreement. The rules leave ambiguity about who controls access to lunar resources. Experts warn disputes could arise as more countries land on Moon.

The Moon As A Future Hub

Scientists stress the first arrivals should not claim permanent control. Shared lunar projects could encourage diplomacy instead of destructive competition. A peaceful Moon ensures exploration benefits humanity rather than just nations.

Lunar resources could fuel rockets and sustain astronauts for decades. The collaboration could prevent a “Wild West” scenario in space settlements. The Moon may become a laboratory for both science and cooperation.