Why 'Make America Happy Again' is Making One of the World's Happiest Countries Unhappy

Representative Image

• Trump renews calls for US control over Greenland, sparking tension with Denmark
• Denmark boosts military presence in Greenland over Arctic security concerns
• European allies join Denmark in Arctic drills, backing sovereignty.

Did our AI summary help?

Denmark has spent years topping global happiness rankings — a model welfare state defined by social trust, political stability and understated diplomacy. Yet today, Copenhagen finds itself unusually rattled. The reason lies thousands of kilometres away, in Washington, and centres on an icy landmass that has suddenly become a geopolitical hotspot: Greenland.

The renewed interest of the United States in Greenland — framed within the broader idea of putting American interests first, or as critics quip, "Make America Happy Again" — has reopened old wounds between allies and exposed the limits of Denmark’s quiet diplomacy.

Trump's Greenland Obsession Returns

Donald Trump's fascination with Greenland is not new. During his first tenure, he had openly floated the idea of acquiring the island, triggering disbelief and diplomatic unease in Copenhagen. Now, with Trump once again shaping US foreign policy discourse, the issue has resurfaced — with sharper edges.

In recent remarks, Trump has argued that Greenland’s security cannot be guaranteed unless it comes under direct American control. He has warned that without US ownership, the island could become vulnerable to growing Chinese and Russian influence in the Arctic — a narrative that frames Greenland not as a partner territory, but as a strategic asset at risk.

Trump has even suggested that NATO should back a US takeover of Greenland, a proposition that strikes at the very foundation of alliance-based security and national sovereignty.

For Denmark, this crossed a red line.

“Fundamental Disagreement” with Washington

The unease became public this week after high-level talks in Washington failed to bridge the gap between the two allies. Denmark's foreign minister acknowledged that a "fundamental disagreement" with Trump over Greenland's future remains unresolved — a rare admission of discord between NATO partners.

While diplomatic language remained measured, the message was clear: Denmark is not willing to entertain any discussion that undermines its sovereignty or Greenland’s right to self-determination.

The talks came amid a rapidly changing security posture in the Arctic, where strategic patience is giving way to visible military signalling.

In response to the increasingly assertive tone from Washington — and the broader uncertainty in the Arctic — Denmark and its NATO allies have begun stepping up their presence in and around Greenland.

Denmark’s defence minister, Troels Lund Poulsen, announced an expansion of military activity in the region, citing a more unpredictable global security environment. The focus, officials stressed, is on modern capabilities — including naval vessels, surveillance drones and fighter aircraft — rather than symbolic or outdated measures.

European allies are also getting involved.

Sweden confirmed that officers from its armed forces have arrived in Greenland to support preparations linked to a Danish military exercise, Operation Arctic Endurance. Norway has announced plans to send military personnel to explore deeper cooperation with allies on Arctic security.

The coordinated moves signal two things: solidarity with Denmark, and a clear message that Greenland’s security will not be dictated unilaterally.

Greenland’s importance goes far beyond its geography. The island hosts critical US military infrastructure, including a key air base, and sits astride emerging Arctic sea routes that could reshape global trade. Its reserves of rare earth minerals make it vital for defence technologies and clean energy supply chains.

While Denmark controls defence and foreign policy, Greenland enjoys extensive self-rule — and its leaders have repeatedly insisted that decisions about the island’s future must be made by Greenlanders themselves.

Trump's framing of Greenland as something that must be “controlled” has fuelled resentment in both Nuuk and Copenhagen, reviving debates around autonomy, dignity and post-colonial power dynamics.

What has unsettled Denmark most is not US concern over Arctic security — which Copenhagen broadly shares — but the transactional tone that has accompanied it.

Denmark is a long-standing NATO member and a reliable US ally. Yet the Greenland episode has made it clear that strategic interests can override diplomatic sensitivities when “America First” logic is applied externally.

Denmark’s case reveals a sobering truth: even the world’s happiest societies are not immune to great-power politics.

The slogan “Make America Happy Again” may resonate with domestic audiences in the US, but abroad it has reignited fears of a world where power matters more than partnership.