Moneycontrol PRO
Loans
Loans
HomeAuthorShishir tripathi

Shishir Tripathi

Journalist And Researcher Based In Delhi

.

He has worked with The Indian Express, Firstpost, Governance Now, and Indic Collective. He writes on Law, Governance and Politics.

The procedure of the in-house probe in case of judicial misconduct

TRENDS

The procedure of the in-house probe in case of judicial misconduct

There’s an in-house inquiry on to ascertain the truth in the matter of the discovery of half-burnt currency notes in the residence of Delhi High Court judge, Justice Yashwant Varma. This mode of inquiry is about three decades old and evolved as a measure to cope with allegations of judicial misconduct 

A 'wall' that is hard to breach

BUSINESS

A 'wall' that is hard to breach

Telangana’s Assembly this month passed a bill with the support of the state’s major political parties to push overall reservation beyond the 50 percent barrier. That’s a tall order as attempts by states such as Bihar and Maharashtra in the recent past have been struck down by the Supreme Court. Decades of jurisprudence on reservation have accommodated multiple points of view but getting past the 50 percent barrier is anything but easy

Can the judiciary ever be made accountable?

TRENDS

Can the judiciary ever be made accountable?

Official misconduct and impropriety are not rare in any branch of the state. What sets the judiciary apart is its lack of accountability. The judges of the higher judiciary, that is, the Supreme Court of India and High Courts, are accountable only to Parliament. However, enforcement of accountability through this mechanism is practically non-existent

Justice Chandrachud was his own man, a disadvantage in a world obsessed with pigeonholing

INDIA

Justice Chandrachud was his own man, a disadvantage in a world obsessed with pigeonholing

A judge’s most important qualification is impartiality and non-commitment to any particular idea or point of view. But, in a highly polarised world, neutrality can be seen as a lack of commitment rather than a principled stance. However, neutrality can also be a form of resistance—an assertion that one refuses to be manipulated into extreme positions 

Bail has to be the rule if clearing judicial backlog matters

TRENDS

Bail has to be the rule if clearing judicial backlog matters

The apex court has tilted in favour of privileging fundamental rights over statutory laws if the prosecution takes an inordinate time to finish investigation. In a related area, there are more than four million pending criminal cases which began over a decade ago. Many languish in jail as undertrials. Is there a way to clear the backlog without being more liberal about bail?

The consequential afterlife of judiciary’s oral observations

TRENDS

The consequential afterlife of judiciary’s oral observations

Oral observations may not find their way into a formal order. However, they can leave a lasting impression on people, even if they are made in an offhand way. They also run the risk of diluting judicial accountability

History and politics of appointments to Election Commission

POLITICS

History and politics of appointments to Election Commission

In Constituent Assembly debates, there was a consensus that the right to vote should be treated as a fundamental right and, therefore, integrity of electoral process is of paramount importance. As Supreme Court hears a challenge to the Parliament’s law on the composition of the selection committee for EC, also at stake is the question of separation of powers between the judiciary, legislature and executive

Fault lines over Waqf Amendment Bill

POLITICS

Fault lines over Waqf Amendment Bill

Amendments to 1995 law governing Waqf properties have led to a particularly fractious showdown between the government and opposition. A look at the points of difference reveals that the most contentious is one which makes it mandatory for Waqf Boards to appoint two non-Muslims, triggering a debate on whether laws governing other religions have a similar requirement

Can the Supreme Court become an interim Parliament?

TRENDS

Can the Supreme Court become an interim Parliament?

This month the Supreme Court will hear a matter examining the scope of Article 141 of the Constitution which says that the law declared by the apex court shall be binding on all courts. The underlying issue centers on a test of legitimacy of legislative power or the Supreme Court’s power under Article 141.

Former CJI Khehar earns government’s appreciation despite taking contrarian positions

INDIA

Former CJI Khehar earns government’s appreciation despite taking contrarian positions

He was awarded Padma Vibushan this year. One of the noteworthy aspects of his tenure at the apex court is that his judgements, particularly in the NJAC case, ran counter to what the government argued. The Padma award is a measure of his credibility 

All about India’s tryst with defamation law

TRENDS

All about India’s tryst with defamation law

Jurisprudence favours a balance between free expression and the right to protection of one’s reputation. A Law Commission recommended that in India defamation be retained within the scheme of criminal laws. The tricky part still remains the search for the line of demarcation between acceptable speech and damage to one’s reputation

As Supreme Court turns 75, a look at some of its milestones

TRENDS

As Supreme Court turns 75, a look at some of its milestones

Created by the Constitution, the Supreme Court in the words of the first Chief Justice HJ Kania has 'goodwill and sympathy for all, but is allied to none.'

Fali Nariman’s acute observations are a launch pad for research on Constitutional issues

TRENDS

Fali Nariman’s acute observations are a launch pad for research on Constitutional issues

An anthology of writings and speeches of the eminent jurist, who passed away last year, contain insightful observations on perennial issues such as corruption and contempt of court. They will continue to be a reference point of many a debate on legal issues

An Indian judge whose work left its mark on judiciary in other lands

TRENDS

An Indian judge whose work left its mark on judiciary in other lands

Justice AN Grover was one of three judges superseded after having been a part of the majority in the landmark ‘Basic Structure’ judgement. He was also part of the bench which decided on the ‘Bank Nationalisation’ and ‘Privy Purses’ cases. Of the three it is ‘Basic Structure’ which left its imprint in other jurisdictions as brought out in an insightful biography of Justice Grover

2024 in Supreme Court: Eight judgements which will reverberate

TRENDS

2024 in Supreme Court: Eight judgements which will reverberate

It was an eventful year with consequential verdicts delivered by constitutional benches. We pick eight of them which impact events down the line. Other than judgements, there were other decisions at the apex court which evoked strong reactions from stakeholders 

Explainer: The never-ending legal tussle over Delhi’s administrative control

INDIA

Explainer: The never-ending legal tussle over Delhi’s administrative control

Since 2015, the Union government and the AAP government in Delhi have been at loggerheads on various issues, ranging from the powers of the Lieutenant Governor (LG) to control over services.

Weaponisation of Section 498A

TRENDS

Weaponisation of Section 498A

In 1983, IPC added Section 498A to protect married women from harassment at the hands of her husband. A law introduced with good intentions has been over the years turned in it's head. It has become in many instances of a breakdown in the marriage, a tool to harass not just the husband but also his relatives

A Constitution is as good as the people and political parties who work it

POLITICS

A Constitution is as good as the people and political parties who work it

As the Parliament gears up for a debate on the Constitution, we revisit BR Ambedkar’s closing speech to the Constituent Assembly where he flagged issues that have contemporary resonance: putting form over substance and partisan loyalties over country. The speech also flags the risk of “Bhakti” worship in politics and the unfinished task of transforming India’s political democracy into a social democracy

The basics of Places of Worship Act and challenges it faces

POLITICS

The basics of Places of Worship Act and challenges it faces

It’s through the tussle between ensuring ‘communal harmony’ and correcting ‘historical wrongs’ that the Act has been scrutinised in the last three decades

Judicial independence is ultimately in the hands of judges

INDIA

Judicial independence is ultimately in the hands of judges

The rule of law is undisputedly one of the most fundamental requirements of the democratic state. And, one ingredient that is essential for enforcing the rule of law is an independent judiciary. That independence can be realised by judges and no one else. As Justice BV Nagarathna said, it’s the “personality” of judges which will determine the extent of judicial independence and autonomy 

‘To call Tipu Sultan a freedom fighter and liberator of India is stretching it a bit much’: Vikram Sampath

BOOKS

‘To call Tipu Sultan a freedom fighter and liberator of India is stretching it a bit much’: Vikram Sampath

Historian Vikram Sampath, with his latest book on the ‘Tiger of Mysore’ attempts to decode the Tipu Sultan riddle.

Who will compensate an innocent whose life is wrecked by the criminal justice system?

TRENDS

Who will compensate an innocent whose life is wrecked by the criminal justice system?

Accused wrongfully convicted and jailed for years suffer a “virtual death”. Allahabad High Court recently acquitted a person who was incarcerated for 13 years following a miscarriage of justice. It made an important suggestion, the court acquitting an innocent should be empowered to fix compensation that will be paid by the State for destroying a life 

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud — A contested legacy

TRENDS

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud — A contested legacy

One of the most consequential heads of the Supreme Court, he leaves behind a mixed legacy. It includes dissents that may in future serve as guideposts, judgements that expanded the scope of fundamental rights and also verdicts which evoked sharp criticism

Supreme Court upholds the idea of limited protection of private property from State takeover

TRENDS

Supreme Court upholds the idea of limited protection of private property from State takeover

A majority of 8:1 in a landmark Supreme Court judgement overturned a decades old interpretation of the Constitution’s directive principles which allows the State to ensure that ownership and control of the material resources of all private property to subserve common good. Now, the majority opinion has reinterpreted that provision to say that it doesn’t cover all private property. Henceforth, State takeover of private property must be judged by a set of guiding principles

Advisory Alert: It has come to our attention that certain individuals are representing themselves as affiliates of Moneycontrol and soliciting funds on the false promise of assured returns on their investments. We wish to reiterate that Moneycontrol does not solicit funds from investors and neither does it promise any assured returns. In case you are approached by anyone making such claims, please write to us at grievanceofficer@nw18.com or call on 02268882347