HomeNewsWorldJPMorgan to pay $153.6m in SEC fraud case

JPMorgan to pay $153.6m in SEC fraud case

JPMorgan Chase & Co agreed to pay USD 153.6 million to settle US Securities and Exchange Commission charges that it defrauded investors who bought mortgage securities it helped sell just before the nation's housing market collapsed.

June 22, 2011 / 16:27 IST

JPMorgan Chase & Co agreed to pay USD 153.6 million to settle US Securities and Exchange Commission charges that it defrauded investors who bought mortgage securities it helped sell just before the nation's housing market collapsed.

The SEC also filed civil charges accusing Edward Steffelin, a former managing director at GSC Capital Corp, of failing to reveal in marketing materials for the transaction, Squared CDO 2007-1, that the Magnetar Capital LLC hedge fund helped choose the underlying securities -- and bet that they would lose value.

Tuesday's announcement marks one of the most significant legal settlements arising out of allegations of Wall Street's role in fueling the 2008 global financial crisis.

It comes less than a year after Goldman Sachs Group Inc agreed to pay USD 550 million to settle SEC charges over another collateralized debt obligation, Abacus. The SEC said Goldman had failed to reveal that hedge fund investor John Paulson had helped choose and bet against the underlying securities.

SEC enforcement chief Robert Khuzami told reporters that the cases are "generally similar" because "there was an undisclosed party who was involved in selecting assets for a CDO that the investors were unaware of."

No JPMorgan executives were charged, and Khuzami said he did not expect any such charges.

"Cases arising out of the credit crisis remain a high priority for the SEC," he added.

Fabrice Tourre, a Goldman vice president, was the only individual charged by the SEC over Abacus and has not settled.

Critics say CDOs such as Squared and Abacus worsened the housing bubble by fueling investors' insatiable demand for debt bearing risks they did not understand, and by causing pain as defaults mounted and the debt lost value or became illiquid.

STEFFELIN LAWYER "BAFFLED"

The JPMorgan settlement calls for the second-largest US bank to pay a USD 133 million fine and USD 20.6 million reflecting improper profits plus interest.

Of the total, USD 125.9 million will go to Squared CDO investors, covering all their losses, and USD 27.7 million will go to the US Treasury.

JPMorgan also voluntarily agreed to pay USD 56.8 million to investors in a separate CDO, Tahoma CDO I.

The bank did not admit wrongdoing, and in a statement said it lost nearly USD 900 million on Squared notes. It said the SEC took the Tahoma payment into account in assessing a penalty.

Alex Lipman, a partner at Nixon Peabody who represents Steffelin, criticized the SEC's actions against his client.

"We are baffled by the SEC's decision to proceed against an individual in a contested proceeding on a negligence theory, especially in a case where Mr. Steffelin did not work for the underwriter and had no responsibility for the contents of the offering memorandum," Lipman said in an interview.

In January, the SEC had sent a "Wells notice" indicating possible civil charges against Steffelin over the Squared CDO. It also sent a similar notice to Michael Llodra, once global head of structured product collateralized debt obligations at JPMorgan, over the 2007 sale of such a product.

"LET'S SCHEDULE THE CESARIAN"

According to the SEC, JPMorgan in 2007 structured the Squared CDO mainly with credit default swaps tied to other CDO securities whose value reflected the health of the nation's housing market.

Squared CDO sales materials indicated that the underlying investments were chosen by a GSC affiliate, but in fact Magnetar played a significant role and held a nearly USD 600 million short position, the SEC said.

The complaint quoted excerpts from internal JPMorgan communications indicating that the bank knew of distress in the housing market but still pushed for the CDO to be sold.

"We are soooo pregnant with this deal, we need a wheel-barrel [sic] to move around.... Let's schedule the cesarian [sic], please!" wrote the person heading the CDO's distribution to sales staff in a March 22, 2007 email quoted in the complaint.

The SEC also suggested Steffelin, a 41-year-old Manhattan resident, had an undisclosed potential conflict of interest when the CDO was being created because he was looking for employment at Magnetar at the time.

"At no time did Mr. Steffelin seek employment with Magnetar," his lawyer Lipman said. "At all times, Mr. Steffelin's interests were aligned with the interests of investors in the deal."

In afternoon trading, JPMorgan shares were up 47 cents or 1.2 percent at $40.95 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The cases are SEC v. JPMorgan Securities LLC, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-04206; and SEC v. Steffelin in the same court, No. 11-04204.

first published: Jun 22, 2011 08:45 am

Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!

Subscribe to Tech Newsletters

  • On Saturdays

    Find the best of Al News in one place, specially curated for you every weekend.

  • Daily-Weekdays

    Stay on top of the latest tech trends and biggest startup news.

Advisory Alert: It has come to our attention that certain individuals are representing themselves as affiliates of Moneycontrol and soliciting funds on the false promise of assured returns on their investments. We wish to reiterate that Moneycontrol does not solicit funds from investors and neither does it promise any assured returns. In case you are approached by anyone making such claims, please write to us at grievanceofficer@nw18.com or call on 02268882347