Why Trump’s $200 million White House ballroom plan is facing backlash from preservation experts

While the White House proper is exempted from the National Historic Preservation Act, it is still subject to advice from the Committee for the Preservation of the White House.

US President Donald Trump's bid to add a vast state ballroom to the White House East Wing has sent shivers down the spines of historic preservationists and ethics experts alike. Unveiled last week, the $200 million, 90,000-square-foot building would be one of the largest structural additions to the White House since the Truman era. Trump is quoted to have stated that he wants the building completed "long before" the completion of his tenure in 2029, as reported by the New York Times.

Preservation concerns about scale and design

While the White House proper is exempted from the National Historic Preservation Act, it is still subject to advice from the Committee for the Preservation of the White House. Such advice, however, is non-obligatory. Experts such as Richard Longstreth of George Washington University advise that the ballroom's grandeur will damage the historicity of the building. Others, like ex-National Park Service director Jonathan Jarvis, emphasize that any additions must be architecturally compatible with the original design.

Security and structural complexities

Construction on White House grounds is more complex than a standard federal project. Every structural modification has to factor in security threats, architectural integrity, and long-term viability. Jarvis, the White House grounds manager for eight years, challenged the administration's aggressive timeline as "overly optimistic." He stated that any modification to the White House requires years since they are strict planning and coordination-related.

Oversight and transparency gaps

While Trump officials have promised to work with preservation groups, there has been no explanation yet on the composition of the oversight committee. Members who were appointed by Biden had their terms expire along with Trump's second term, and none were replaced. Ethics watchdogs also note the gap when it comes to sources of money. Trump said that he and "patriot donors" would fund it, but did not say if foreign donations would be permitted.

Architect defends vision, critics voice ethical objections

The ballroom is being designed by James McCrery of McCrery Architects, who himself was earlier appointed by Trump to the Commission of Fine Arts. McCrery has promised to be sensitive to the historic appearance. Others like Kathleen Clark, a Washington University law professor, are questioning the ethics of private or secret donations for a high-profiled federal makeover. "He thinks he can do anything," she said about Trump.

Legacy ambitions amid political momentum

Trump's push for the ballroom comes as he records legislative and judicial victories and attempts to leave his mark indelibly on the presidency. While additions like the Truman Balcony and West Wing originally encountered opposition before they gained iconic status, critics argue that this effort isn't subject to the same institutional scrutiny. Whether the project is added to that legacy—or a representation of unbridled presidential authority—is yet to be decided.