What newly released emails reveal about Epstein and Trump

Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump (File photo)

More than twenty thousand pages of documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate were released this week, giving the public the clearest view yet of how Epstein and his circle discussed Donald Trump across different moments in his political rise. The emails span from 2011, when Epstein was attempting to re-enter public life after his conviction, to 2019, when scrutiny around his past had intensified once again, the New York Times reported.

US House Democrats drew attention to several messages that they said pointed to deeper awareness on Trump’s part. House Republicans countered that the selection was misleading and released a far larger cache of Epstein’s communications. The result is a patchwork of internal conversations that reveal how Epstein monitored political developments, commented on Trump’s behaviour and reputation, and sought advice on how to respond when his own name resurfaced in the news.

Emails that Democrats highlighted

One of the earliest references appears in 2011. Epstein was working to rehabilitate his public image, and tabloids had begun documenting his attempts to re-enter social circles. In this period, he exchanged a series of emails with Ghislaine Maxwell. In one message, he wrote that “the dog that hasn’t barked is trump,” claiming that a victim had spent time in his house with Trump and that Trump had never been mentioned in the ensuing coverage. Republicans later said the victim he referred to was Virginia Giuffre, who had come forward publicly around that time. Years later, Giuffre said in a civil case that she had never seen Trump participate in any wrongdoing.

This early set of emails shows Epstein following news about his allegations closely and worrying about who might speak publicly. Trump, then best known for hosting a television show and floating the possibility of a presidential run, appeared regularly in the conversations.

Exchanges during the 2016 campaign

A notable set of emails from 2015 shows Epstein corresponding with journalist Michael Wolff. CNN was said to be preparing to ask Trump about Epstein, and Wolff suggested that Epstein let Trump “hang himself” by denying his past association. He then argued that Epstein could use the moment to generate “political currency,” or, if Trump appeared likely to win, to offer him protection and create a sense of obligation. Epstein replied by asking what kind of answer could be crafted for Trump if he wanted to be helpful.

This exchange captures a period when Epstein, though not in the public eye, still operated within elite networks. It also shows Wolff advising him on how to react to Trump’s growing political relevance. Trump never received the question during that night’s debate, and the emails do not clarify whether a planned strategy was ever communicated to him.

Epstein’s claims in 2019

In early 2019, when renewed reporting brought Epstein back into the headlines and the Justice Department announced it was reviewing his earlier plea deal, Epstein wrote again to Wolff. In one message he claimed that Trump “knew about the girls,” adding that Trump had once asked Maxwell to stop something at Mar-a-Lago. No further detail about this claim appears in the released documents, and the email reflects Epstein’s own framing rather than outside corroboration.

By this point, Trump was in the White House, and the connection to Epstein’s 2008 plea deal became a political issue because Alexander Acosta, who negotiated that agreement, was Trump’s labour secretary. During Acosta’s confirmation hearing in 2017, Epstein monitored developments closely, asking his lawyer who would represent Acosta at the Senate proceedings.

Watching Trump from a distance

Another theme across the emails is Epstein’s constant tracking of Trump’s activities. In late 2016, Wolff urged Epstein to consider taking an anti-Trump stance ahead of the release of a book about Epstein’s life. Later, in 2019, one of Epstein’s advisers, Richard Kahn, sent him a list of observations drawn from Trump’s financial disclosure forms. The email offers a detailed, critical reading of Trump’s finances, though it does not reveal what Epstein intended to do with the information.

These exchanges suggest that Epstein and his circle were still following Trump closely, even as their own legal challenges mounted. The tone of the emails varies from strategic curiosity to open frustration, but they consistently show Epstein attempting to understand the political landscape and the risks it posed to him.

How the messages fit into the wider context

What emerges from the documents is not a single narrative but a series of fragments. Epstein discusses Trump at moments when his own legal exposure or reputation is at stake. Associates offer strategic advice. Journalists and lawyers appear intermittently. The emails do not provide a comprehensive record of their interactions, nor do they settle long-standing questions about the nature of their relationship. Instead, they show how Trump lingered in Epstein’s private conversations as a figure whose political future could affect Epstein’s public scrutiny.

For investigators and lawmakers, the emails now serve as raw material for broader political arguments. For readers, they offer a chronological window into the shifting dynamics between power, scandal and influence in the years before and after Trump entered national politics.