The regulator was investigating whether Sanjay Chandra and Ajay Chandra were routing funds through their offshore accounts
The duo will, however, continue to remain in jail as they are accused in a money laundering case
A bench of justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah asked Preeti Chandra to submit her Dominican Republic passport or any other passport that she has to the investigating officer before being allowed out of prison.
The ED had recently filed a fresh charge sheet before a court here in connection with its money laundering probe against realty group Unitech, its promoter brothers Sanjay Chandra and Ajay Chandra and others.
ED said the brothers were taken into custody on Monday and have been brought to Delhi from Mumbai where they were lodged in separate jails in an alleged cheating case filed by the Delhi Police.
Sources said the wife of jailed Unitech promoter Sanjay Chandra hid details such as transfer of funds into her personal accounts and her directorship with a number of companies.
Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana sent Preeti Chandra to ED's custody till October 9, Ramesh Chandra to October 8, and Rajesh Malik till October 11.
The interim bail was granted as Chandra’s father-in-law passed away on May 31.
A criminal case was registered under various sections of the PMLA against the Unitech Group and its promoters over allegations that the owners — Sanjay Chandra and Ajay Chandra — illegally diverted over Rs 2,000 crore to Cyprus and Cayman Island.
Chandra sought permission to be produced physically before the mediation centre at Patiala House Courts Complex here.
Supreme Court granted the bail as Sanjay Chandra’s parents have tested positive for COVID-19.
Justice Vibhu Bakhru issued notice to the Tihar Jail authorities and sought their stand on Chandras' plea before the next date of hearing on June 9.
As many as 74 projects are under construction and over 16,000 homebuyers have invested in these projects.
Former telecom minister A Raja and DMK MP Kanimozhi were today acquitted by a special court in the case. Fifteen other accused and three companies were also acquitted.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said the money, to be deposited in the apex court registry, will be used in facilitating refund to the home buyers who want their money back.
A Delhi court, on April 10, 2017, granted a three-month interim bail to Unitech Ltd‘s promoters, Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra, who were arrested in a fraud case relating to a Gurugram-based real estate R
A Delhi court today granted a three-month interim bail to Unitech Ltd promoters Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra arrested in a fraud case relating to a Gurugram-based real estate project.
A Delhi court, on April 6, 2017, denied bail to Unitech‘s promoters, Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra, arrested in a fraud case relating to a Gurugram-based real estate project and sent them to judicial R
To avoid the recurrence of Unitech like cases, it is important for homebuyer association members to take the lead and act as a bridge to raise funds, in case the builder claims he is bankrupt.
Realty firm Unitech Ltd today said it has not committed fraud on any investor and the delay in delivery of project is due to reasons beyond its control and recession in the real estate sector.
Metropolitan Magistrate Ashu Garg allowed the plea of the Delhi Police after the probe agency submitted that a few offices and other premises of the accused persons were yet to be searched in the case.
Home buyers of Unitech’s housing projects in Noida and Gurugram had approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission after the builder had failed to give them possession of their flats as the per schedule.
A Delhi court has cancelled the non-bailable warrants (NBWs) against the two managing directors of real estate major Unitech Ltd, Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra, in a case of alleged misappropriation of Rs 500 R
Unitech, its Chairman Ramesh Chandra, Managing Directors Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra and four other Directors have been named as accused in the complaint.
The punitive measure was awarded after the real estate giant failed to give possessions of a residential unit in Mohali to two Delhi-based clients even after making the payment on time. Then, the commission sought explanation from the builder and asked them to settle dues of Rs 53 lakhs.