Despite explicit court orders, Bar Council resolutions, and even petitions seeking to ban such colonial honorifics, their persistence raises a deeper question: is this merely a colonial relic that refuses to fade, or an institutional compulsion the judiciary itself continues to uphold?
A dissent in the Supreme Court may not be an explanation in a lost cause. Jurisprudence is filled with examples where a subsequent generation saw merit in the logic undergirding an earlier dissent and mainstreamed it
Mediation in India today is too often a box to be ticked, a hollow formality. Without a credible cost for walking away, mediation will remain symbolic. With such consequences, however, it could become the pressure valve India’s clogged courts desperately need
The clocks of justice in India can tick faster with the right reforms. With thoughtful interventions from public institutions like the Finance Commission, it is possible to align public funding with the judiciary's operational needs. By addressing issues of disparity in budgetary allocations and the need for improvement of the quality of public funding to the judiciary, the 16th Finance Commission can strengthen the rule of law
While POCSO aims to protect children, courts and reports reveal growing misuse in consensual teen relationships, prompting calls for nuanced reforms that balance child rights with justice and intent
This book examines systemic issues plaguing India’s district courts, highlighting judicial delays, lack of independence, and flawed oversight, while advocating structural reforms and accountability of higher judiciary to improve justice delivery
The India Justice Report 2025 highlights major challenges in India’s judiciary, including judge shortages, high caseloads, poor infrastructure, and inadequate legal aid, urging urgent reforms to improve access to justice and system efficiency
Official misconduct and impropriety are not rare in any branch of the state. What sets the judiciary apart is its lack of accountability. The judges of the higher judiciary, that is, the Supreme Court of India and High Courts, are accountable only to Parliament. However, enforcement of accountability through this mechanism is practically non-existent
The apex court has tilted in favour of privileging fundamental rights over statutory laws if the prosecution takes an inordinate time to finish investigation. In a related area, there are more than four million pending criminal cases which began over a decade ago. Many languish in jail as undertrials. Is there a way to clear the backlog without being more liberal about bail?
Oral observations may not find their way into a formal order. However, they can leave a lasting impression on people, even if they are made in an offhand way. They also run the risk of diluting judicial accountability
He was awarded Padma Vibushan this year. One of the noteworthy aspects of his tenure at the apex court is that his judgements, particularly in the NJAC case, ran counter to what the government argued. The Padma award is a measure of his credibility
An anthology of writings and speeches of the eminent jurist, who passed away last year, contain insightful observations on perennial issues such as corruption and contempt of court. They will continue to be a reference point of many a debate on legal issues
In 1983, IPC added Section 498A to protect married women from harassment at the hands of her husband. A law introduced with good intentions has been over the years turned in it's head. It has become in many instances of a breakdown in the marriage, a tool to harass not just the husband but also his relatives
The rule of law is undisputedly one of the most fundamental requirements of the democratic state. And, one ingredient that is essential for enforcing the rule of law is an independent judiciary. That independence can be realised by judges and no one else. As Justice BV Nagarathna said, it’s the “personality” of judges which will determine the extent of judicial independence and autonomy
Accused wrongfully convicted and jailed for years suffer a “virtual death”. Allahabad High Court recently acquitted a person who was incarcerated for 13 years following a miscarriage of justice. It made an important suggestion, the court acquitting an innocent should be empowered to fix compensation that will be paid by the State for destroying a life
India’s legal aid system remains underfunded and inefficient. Only 1% of eligible individuals access free legal aid, with poor quality and low pay for lawyers contributing to the system's failures, leaving many without proper representation
The Collegium system was not part of the original Constitution, rather it was introduced later by a novel judicial invention—which is unparalleled in the world. But one of the prominent criticism is that the Collegium system has brought the judiciary and executive at loggerheads
Recent Supreme Court judgements have prioritised personal liberty, putting bail over jail. A judgement this month extended the logic to anticipatory bail, which will now be treated as a standalone appeal even when one is custody for an unrelated offence.
It's meant to unclog the strained wheels of justice. Modi 3.0 has made it a priority in its agenda of judicial reforms
The brouhaha over signboards and branding in the local language is not unique to Karnataka as other states too have rules to this effect. Most say that the local language has to be prominently displayed on top, followed by other languages, if any.
While the handbook will be helpful for the bench, it would be equally important that the law students and members of the bar also go through training on this subject. This will ensure that their arguments in courts of law are free of gender stereotyping labels
A two-pronged, bottom-up approach that involves recruiting more judicial officers in the district judiciary and ramping up the supporting structural components they need like more courtrooms, court staff, basic amenities and technology cannot wait any longer. There are more than 4 crore cases pending in the lower judiciary
The cases being withdrawn under the Special Drive-II are corollary to the amendment brought out by the Government vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 for decriminalisation of offences under the Companies Act, 2013.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has already opposed these appeals, some from gay couples, on the grounds that such marriages are not ”comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, a wife and children.”
The limitations placed on foreign law firms seem designed to provide Indian lawyers with an opportunity to establish offices overseas and follow their clients as Indian conglomerates grow in size and international footprint