Moneycontrol PRO
UPCOMING EVENT:Moneycontrol Pro & Espresso presents Nifty Banker 2.0 - India's First Retail Index Traders Online Conference. 12 Webinars at Early bird offer of just Rs.50/- per webinar exclusive for Moneycontrol Pro subscribers. Register now!
you are here: HomeNewsOpinion

COVID-19 | Are we corporatising CSR?

At a time when deep social issues have surfaced because of COVID-19, it is troubling that the very concept of corporate social responsibility is sought to be altered

April 30, 2020 / 03:23 PM IST
Representative Image

Representative Image

Harini Subramani

At a time when deep social issues have surfaced as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is ironic and troubling that the very concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is sought to be altered to erode the founding spirit of the rules. The proposed amendment — open for public comments until April 20 — seek to change, among others, the definition and the manner by which CSR activities may be funded.

The present definition is inclusive, and open-ended, defining what consists CSR, whereas the proposal seeks to restrict the activities to only those specified in the Companies Act, 2013, and excludes specific areas. There are two exclusions in this ‘negative normative’ that need re-thinking.

The first of these exclusions relates to allocating CSR funds for employees of the company. Where presently the CSR rules state that ‘activities only for the employees’ shall not be considered as CSR activities, the proposed amendment has sought to exempt companies where beneficiaries account for less than 25 percent of the employees.

A word of caution: Even the present rule is unclear in its applicability given the dual interpretation (the operative word being ‘only’ and its placement in the rule). One interpretation is, can those activities which involve employees and other persons be categorised as CSR activities. The other is, do we interpret it to mean that the present rules exclude activities relating to employees from the ambit of CSR?


COVID-19 Vaccine

Frequently Asked Questions

View more
How does a vaccine work?

A vaccine works by mimicking a natural infection. A vaccine not only induces immune response to protect people from any future COVID-19 infection, but also helps quickly build herd immunity to put an end to the pandemic. Herd immunity occurs when a sufficient percentage of a population becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. The good news is that SARS-CoV-2 virus has been fairly stable, which increases the viability of a vaccine.

How many types of vaccines are there?

There are broadly four types of vaccine — one, a vaccine based on the whole virus (this could be either inactivated, or an attenuated [weakened] virus vaccine); two, a non-replicating viral vector vaccine that uses a benign virus as vector that carries the antigen of SARS-CoV; three, nucleic-acid vaccines that have genetic material like DNA and RNA of antigens like spike protein given to a person, helping human cells decode genetic material and produce the vaccine; and four, protein subunit vaccine wherein the recombinant proteins of SARS-COV-2 along with an adjuvant (booster) is given as a vaccine.

What does it take to develop a vaccine of this kind?

Vaccine development is a long, complex process. Unlike drugs that are given to people with a diseased, vaccines are given to healthy people and also vulnerable sections such as children, pregnant women and the elderly. So rigorous tests are compulsory. History says that the fastest time it took to develop a vaccine is five years, but it usually takes double or sometimes triple that time.

View more

Assuming the latter, the proposed amendment seeks to allow a company to allow certain funds to be allocated towards employees so long as it does not cross the specified threshold. However, this implies that the very substratum of CSR is lost as there is no public benefit (or social good) being passed on from the corporate.

The second of these exclusions is where activities undertaken by a company outside India cannot be considered as a CSR activity. However, this exclusion is extremely wide and fails to take into account, say, social activities benefitting Indian citizens in other countries to participate in fields such as education, promoting gender equality, empowering women and rural sports, nationally recognised sports, Paralympic/ Olympic sports (all of which are part of Schedule VII).

It is recommended that the language in these amendments be changed to provide for spending of CSR in these areas as well.

The other aspect up for scrutiny is the manner in which the CSR activities may be undertaken.

The present rules permit Section 8 (not-for-profit) companies, registered trusts, or registered societies, which have an established track record of three years in similar activities, to undertake CSR. The proposed amendment has done away with these options, and instead, a CSR activity may be undertaken by the company itself or, through a Section 8 company or, through any entity established under an Act of Parliament or a State legislature so long as it is duly registered with the central government.

At first glance, the types of entities that can undertake the CSR activities has been broadened. However, from a practical perspective, would there be any agency monitoring the activities of these ‘entities’ to ensure that they stick to the CSR activities? Otherwise, such a broad-based reference could be prone to misuse. Hence this begs the question, should entities be restricted to not-for-profit or charitable trusts/societies?

There have also been murmurs that the proposed changes to the type of entities would disbar CSR activities through existing public trusts. This is not stated explicitly in the proposed amendments, and it also means that a company cannot engage with international organisations for implementation of a CSR project.

There are other minor changes in the proposed amendment that could have significant impacts. For example, the proposed rules allow for a company to collaborate only with other ‘companies’, but can be meaningfully allowed to include other entities. Further, the requirement of an impact assessment by companies for their CSR projects or programmes can get tedious, especially for one-time activities that may not always achieve the desired social results.

We are also at an interesting juncture where the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued a circular and clarification on COVID-19-related CSR spends. Interestingly, the Supreme Court has ruled many times over that circulars are not binding in nature and cannot contradict statutory provisions, which an FAQ appears to have.

Given the crippling effects that COVID-19 will have on the economy, this bridge can be crossed after seeing how many companies would even qualify per the CSR monetary thresholds for the next few financial years.

(Saamir Raketla contributed to the article.) 

Harini Subramani is an advocate. Twitter: @subramaniharini. Views are personal.
Moneycontrol Contributor
first published: Apr 30, 2020 01:50 pm

stay updated

Get Daily News on your Browser
ISO 27001 - BSI Assurance Mark