Moneycontrol PRO
LAMF
LAMF

CJI Surya Kant recuses from EC appointment case: 'Somebody may accuse me of conflict of interest'

The Court subsequently directed that the case be listed on April 7 before a separately designated Bench.
March 26, 2026 / 21:39 IST
Row over exclusion of CJI from Election Commissioner selection panel despite prior Supreme Court ruling
Snapshot AI
  • CJI Surya Kant steps down from EC appointment law case
  • Petitions challenge exclusion of CJI from EC selection panel
  • Case to be heard by a Bench not in line to become CJI

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant on Friday stepped aside from hearing a batch of petitions challenging the legal framework governing the appointment and service conditions of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners.

The matter was listed before a Bench also comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi. At the outset, the CJI indicated his reservations about continuing with the case, stating, "Should I hear this matter? Somebody may accuse me of a conflict of interest."

The petitions question the validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. One of the key grounds of challenge is that the law excludes the Chief Justice of India from the selection panel responsible for appointing Election Commissioners.

During the hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for one of the petitioners, suggested that the matter be assigned to a Bench that does not include a judge who is in line to become the Chief Justice of India. The suggestion found favour with CJI Kant, who agreed to recuse in order to avoid any perception of bias.

"This is what was in my mind. I should mark the matter to a Bench where the judge is not in line to become CJI. Then nobody can say anything. I have already done my homework," he remarked.

The Court subsequently directed that the case be listed on April 7 before a separately designated Bench.

The controversy surrounding the 2023 law stems from an earlier Supreme Court ruling in Anoop Baranwal v Union of India and others, which had called for the inclusion of the CJI in the committee responsible for appointing Election Commissioners.

The current law, however, provides for a selection panel consisting of the Prime Minister, a Union Cabinet Minister, and the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha.

Previously, in 2024, a Bench led by former CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta had declined to stay the operation of the law. The same Bench had also refused to interfere with the appointments of Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Gyanesh Kumar made under the statute.

Rewati Karan
Rewati Karan is Senior Sub Editor at Moneycontrol. She covers law, politics, business, and national affairs. She was previously Principal Correspondent at Financial Express and Copyeditor at ThePrint where she wrote feature stories and covered legal news. She has also worked extensively in social media, videos and podcasts at ThePrint and India Today. She can be reached at rewati.karan@nw18.com | Twitter: @RewatiKaran
first published: Mar 20, 2026 04:31 pm

Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!

Subscribe to Tech Newsletters

  • On Saturdays

    Find the best of Al News in one place, specially curated for you every weekend.

  • Daily-Weekdays

    Stay on top of the latest tech trends and biggest startup news.

Advisory Alert: It has come to our attention that certain individuals are representing themselves as affiliates of Moneycontrol and soliciting funds on the false promise of assured returns on their investments. We wish to reiterate that Moneycontrol does not solicit funds from investors and neither does it promise any assured returns. In case you are approached by anyone making such claims, please write to us at grievanceofficer@nw18.com or call on 02268882347