During the tech sector’s pandemic-era boom, employee headcount became one of the reigning barometers of success. Quarter after quarter, alongside traditional metrics like revenue growth and operating margin, companies across Silicon Valley reported to analysts and investors the thousands of workers they had added to their ballooning payrolls.
A prime follower of this more-the-merrier hiring approach was Facebook parent company Meta Platforms Inc., which for the last three years grew its employee base at a dizzying pace. Between the end of 2019 and its peak headcount in 2022, the company nearly doubled in size to some 87,000 employees.
The hiring sustained its ambitious (and in some cases seemingly ill-fated) projects like its big bet on the metaverse. But it also let the company take an aggressive stance in the talent wars as it scooped up skilled tech workers rather than watch them migrate to competitors. Recently, a former Meta employee who was laid off in the first round of cuts, said in a video posted on rival platform TikTok that it “seemed like Meta was hiring us so other companies couldn’t have us and then they were just kind of hoarding us like Pokémon cards.”
But now in a serious case of corporate whiplash, Meta Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday said that the company would slash an additional 10,000 employees on top of the 11,000 in cuts announced in November. Taken together, that’s a nearly 25 percent reduction of its workforce from the company’s peak just six months ago. Investors sent the stock up 7.25 percent Tuesday, though the shares are still hovering at around half the value reached during their 2021 zenith.
During the pandemic, as tech CEOs accelerated their empire building, a massive and growing headcount somehow became equated with a company’s overall health — a sign that it had cash, clout and big ambitions. Apple Inc. was unique in avoiding a pandemic-fueled hiring binge, and thus big layoffs. But for the rest, a mammoth employee base now means bloat and a lack of discipline, hence why Zuckerberg has dubbed 2023 Meta’s “Year of Efficiency.”
Tech companies are instead turning to more traditional ways to measure success — in part because that’s what Wall Street is demanding as the economy and their performance sours. At Salesforce Inc., for example, CEO Marc Benioff for years was able to defy calls to grow the company’s profitability alongside revenue. Now, as he faces off against a half dozen activist investors, he has cut his workforce by thousands and has lasered in on profit margins. For Zuckerberg, broad restructuring also lets him quietly pull back on business ventures that don’t seem to be going anywhere, such as his misguided efforts to sell virtual reality headsets to employers.
One source of inspiration for slimming down comes from none other than Elon Musk, who has decimated Twitter’s staff since acquiring the social media platform last year. It has gone from 7,500 employees to about 2,000, with reportedly an additional 10 percent of employees cut as recently as last month. That Musk has somehow been able to keep the social media platform running — many would argue just barely — on a demoralised skeleton crew has likely given other tech CEOs license to reevaluate the scale of their own operations and their ability to do more with less.
Silicon Valley enterprises tend to work in a herd mentality. They hire together as a pack, and they fire together as a pack. That’s one reason why so many of the initial cuts across the sector fell in the 6 percent to 10 percent range of a company’s overall head count. There doesn’t appear to be any real magic to those numbers, other than that’s what the other guy was doing.
With Meta now hitting a nearly 25 percent staff reduction, there is a very real likelihood that others in the tech world will follow suit. But if there was ever a time to break free of tech’s group-think mentality, this is it. The companies that apply more rigor to their layoff decisions than they did to their freewheeling hiring will be the ones who reap the greatest benefit in the long run.
Beth Kowitt is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering corporate America. Views are personal and do not represent the stand of this publication.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. Views are personal and do not represent the stand of this publication.
Credit: Bloomberg
