Smart ways to split contributions across SIPs, EPF and NPS

Representative image

Most salaried people contribute to all three instruments at the same time: SIPs for market growth, EPF for long-term security and NPS for retirement-focused tax benefits. But while these tools often run in parallel, they were designed with very different purposes. SIPs are meant to harness the long-term power of equities and provide flexible wealth creation. EPF is a slow and steady compounding machine that locks away money safely for decades. NPS ensures you build a retirement income stream through a mix of equity, debt and a mandatory annuity.

When you start seeing all three as a single integrated system—rather than three unrelated buckets—you can optimise risk, liquidity and future income in a way that feels balanced and sustainable.

The first step is not deciding how much to put into EPF or NPS. It is ensuring you have enough accessible money. A buffer of six months’ expenses in liquid funds, sweep-in FDs or ultra-short-term debt funds protects you from job loss, medical emergencies or large planned expenses.

EPF already locks away a portion of your salary. NPS locks money away until age sixty. This means your SIPs and your emergency fund must shoulder the responsibility of keeping your money flexible.

If monthly cash flows feel tight, increase SIPs first—slowly and sustainably—before committing more to NPS or voluntary EPF. Long-term goals should never strain short-term survival.

SIPs put market volatility to work for you, which is why consistency matters more than timing. A useful baseline for salaried individuals is to invest 20 to 30 percent of take-home pay through SIPs across categories such as large-cap, flexi-cap and a measured exposure to mid-caps for extra growth.

The simplest way to stay disciplined is to increase SIPs by 5 to 10 percent every year when your salary rises. This builds wealth quietly in the background without demanding big lifestyle sacrifices. It also keeps your equity allocation relevant as your income grows.

EPF is often overlooked because it feels “boring,” but it may be the most powerful part of your long-term savings. Its interest is tax-free, its deductions are automated and its compounding horizon spans decades.

If your employer allows voluntary EPF, add top-ups only when your liquidity buffer is strong. EPF’s lock-in is both its strength and its limitation. It is your financial spine—steady, safe and predictable—but not something you should overload at the cost of flexibility.

NPS Tier 1 works best when you are in the 30 percent tax slab or want to use Section 80CCD(1B) for an extra deduction. Because it locks in funds until age sixty and requires partial annuitisation, treat it as a retirement-income tool rather than a general investment.

For most earners, committing around 10 to 15 percent of annual income to NPS is enough to capture meaningful tax savings while keeping most savings flexible and growth-oriented.

In your 20s and early 30s, prioritise SIPs for aggressive wealth building while relying on EPF as your steady base.

In your 40s, shift gradually toward stability by valuing EPF and NPS more, especially as retirement clarity improves and market risk feels heavier.

In your 50s, maintain SIP discipline but increase NPS only if your retirement corpus looks insufficient. At this stage, capital preservation becomes as important as capital growth.

Your contributions do not need monthly tinkering. A single annual review—checking SIP amounts, EPF balances, NPS returns and asset allocation—is enough. If your salary goes up, raise SIPs first, then NPS, and let EPF continue as the automatic, stable backbone of your long-term savings. In the end, your wealth is built not by choosing the perfect product each month, but by creating a thoughtful rhythm across SIPs, EPF and NPS—and sticking to it year after year.