Remarks of advocate Hitesh Jain, a member of the 23rd Law Commission came days after 56 former judges slammed the statement of 18 former judges, who had defended Reddy against Home Minister Shah's criticism.
On July 14, the law panel extended the deadline for the public to send their views on UCC till July 28, saying the decision was taken following an overwhelming response and numerous requests seeking more time for submitting suggestions.
On June 14, the law panel had sought responses from organisations and the public on the UCC. The one-month deadline for filing responses ended on Friday, following which it was extended.
The Commission is also likely to call certain organisations and people for a personal hearing in the coming days.
In its disclaimer, the law panel referred to "certain WhatsApp texts, calls, and messages" being circulated pertaining to the UCC.
Till Tuesday evening, the law panel had received nearly 8.5 lakh responses on its public notice.
The law on adverse possession provides that any person who is in possession of a private land for more than 12 years or a government land for over 30 years can gain ownership of the property. A legal heir can only make a claim by filing a suit for recovery within the prescribed period.
Asked if the work done by the Uttarakhand UCC committee can be replicated at the national level, Justice (retired) Ranjana Prakash Desai said, "It is our wish that we come up with such good work which can be followed by other states."
The law minister also further said that the law commission's report on sedition is one of the steps in the extensive consultation process that the government has undertaken.
The law commission's report has recommended that the punishment for committing an act of sedition be increased to seven years from the current punishment of three years.
Instead of a full-fledged report on a uniform civil code, the law panel preferred a consultation paper as it had little time at hand to bring out a comprehensive report.
If betting is legalised it could become a $100-130 billion industry in India.
With less than a year to go for the 2019 general elections, operational guidelines are yet to be fleshed out. There are no clear answers to many questions.
Seeking to find a common ground on the issue, the commission has written to the seven recognised national and 59 state parties to participate in the meeting on July 7 and 8.
The commission has asked the general public to tell how far will legalising betting and gambling be "morally correct" in the Indian circumstances.
The Law Ministry's Department of Legal Affairs has also asked the Commission to submit a report regarding the issue.
The Department of Legal Affairs in the Law Ministry had recently proposed to make the law panel, which advises government on complex legal issues, into a permanent body either through an Act of Parliament or an executive order (resolution of the Union Cabinet).
One of three full-time members Justice (retd) Usha Mehra and both the ex-officio members - Law secretary P K Malhotra and Legislative Secretary Sanjay Singh gave their dissenting notes.
The draft report circulated among members favours speedy abolition of death penalty from statue books, except in cases where accused is convicted of involvement in a terror case.
"The Shah report in fact has come out. I believe they have said the Minimum Alternate Tax (for the period before April 1, 2015) issue should be resolved quickly, which I think will be positive for the market...," he told reporters at the launch of 'Innofest' at the Indian Institute of Science here.
The committee has been mandated by MHA to suggest alternate legal measures so as to avoid the possible misuse of social media in the interest of National Security and maintenance of public order.
The deadline, which was ending today, has now been extended till July 31. Set up by the Corporate Affairs Ministry last month, the Companies Law Committee is expected to finalise its report in six months.
A P J Abdul Kalam has supported abolition of the death penalty saying that as President of India, he felt pain in deciding on such cases as most of them had "social and economic bias".
Commercial Courts: Speedy Justice?
Former Law Commission chairman and chief of Indian Court of Sports Arbitration, Justice AR Lakshmanan has said it was time that the Centre stepped in and brought about amendments to the Arbitration Act.