Moneycontrol
HomeNewsBusinessFour years after his flight to UK, getting back Vijay Mallya, and the Rs 10,000 crore he owes is a fading hope

Four years after his flight to UK, getting back Vijay Mallya, and the Rs 10,000 crore he owes is a fading hope

Bankers forgot the golden rules before the flamboyant liquor baron and lent to an airline that never made profits in its eight years of existence.

February 20, 2020 / 15:01 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
File image: Vijay Mallya

Four years ago, Indian liquor baron Vijay Mallya left for the UK on March 2, 2016. This was just hours before a consortium of banks rushed to the Supreme Court seeking his detention and the immediate repayment of outstanding dues on loans. Mallya owed Rs 9,000 crore to banks—an amount he had borrowed in multiple installments to keep his failing airline, Kingfisher, alive.

Since his flight to the UK, the baron has been waging a legal war against his lenders, investigators and the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) by disputing charges of financial fraud and wilful default leveled against him. The MEA, in April, 2016, revoked his passport. Several rounds of hearings in British and Indian courts have happened since then, which would lead to Mallya being arrested and released within hours multiple times. While the court room drama continues, the banks have become sitting ducks as no money has come back to them yet. Good money turned bad

Till now, banks have not recovered even a fraction of what Mallya owes to them. Bankers said the original Rs 9,000 crore that was lent to Mallya has now grown to Rs 10,000 crore at least, which includes the accrued interest amount. The Narendra Modi government, which initially, followed up actively on Mallya’s extradition case, seems to be in a waiting mode now. It can't do much since the ball has now landed is in the Britisher's courts.

Story continues below Advertisement

An immediate extradition of the billionaire looks unlikely. Mallya has an army of influential lawyers who can make things endlessly tough for the Indian side in court rooms. On February 18, the Supreme Court adjourned a plea by Mallya that was seeking a stay on the proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to declare him a fugitive economic offender and confiscate his assets. The matter will now be heard in March after the Holi break of the court. To cut a long story court, in the long legal battle, the flamboyant son of Vittal Mallya has so far managed to have a clear upper hand over his legal opponents. How the cookie crumbled for banks

There was a time when Banks queued up before Mallya's office to gift him loans, with or without collateral. For them, Mallya's name was enough to sign the disbursal forms. There were 17 banks headed by country’s largest lender State Bank of India (SBI), which lent money to Kingfisher over a period of few years (both fund based and non-fund) and issued fresh funding lines when Mallya’s company was struggling to stay afloat.

Close to Rs 1,700 crore was lent by SBI, the lead bank of the group, while IDBI Bank gave Rs 900 crore. Other banks, a mix of state-run and private lenders, contributed a few hundred crore each. Much of the loans was given based on a personal guarantee of Mallya. The other collateral included the Kingfisher brand— one of the rarest cases when a huge sum was lent to a corporate just against the brand name.

These banks later converted a sizable chunk of loans into equity. SBI and ICICI Bank had converted Kingfisher's shares at Rs 64.48 each, which was at a 60 percent premium to then prevailing market price. The prices crashed to reach penny stock values within 16 months.  Kingfisher has since been de-listed from the exchanges. Clearly, banks wouldn’t earn anything by selling these shares. Neither can they think of reviving the company for the simple reason that they know nothing about the business of aviation. So if they were to recover any loans, they should have sold the shares quickly. This didn’t happen. What's next for banks?