HomeNewsTrendsFeaturesFounders’ excesses are turning public opinion against many startups

Founders’ excesses are turning public opinion against many startups

Many of India’s entrepreneurs are doing themselves a disservice by flashing their wealth and their attitude blatantly.

March 19, 2022 / 09:22 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
If there is one thing that is common to the founders of an earlier generation of startups like Infosys, Wipro, Mindtree and Happiest Minds, it is a deep sense of conservatism and a commitment to wear their wealth lightly. (Illustration by Suneesh K.)
If there is one thing that is common to the founders of an earlier generation of startups like Infosys, Wipro, Mindtree and Happiest Minds, it is a deep sense of conservatism and a commitment to wear their wealth lightly. (Illustration by Suneesh K.)

Their big bulge investors may be undeterred, but to the laity, the excesses of some of the start-up founders in India are beginning to jar. Which is why when PayTM founder Vijay Shekhar Sharma was recently arrested and charged over a driving violation, the general reaction seemed to be, he had it coming, rather than the more rational question about why a person would be arrested for what seemed like a minor road incident in which no one was injured nor any major damage caused.

Many of India’s entrepreneurs are doing themselves a disservice by flashing their wealth and their attitude blatantly. Controversial shark tank judge and co-founder of BharatPe, Ashneer Grover, has been in the news for all the wrong reasons, sparring with his company’s board that sought his ouster on the heels of a no-holds barred invective-laden joust with a bank executive (Grover has said this was fabricated). Another co-founder of an edtech startup claims he needs a suite at the city's most expensive hotel to be able to think.

Story continues below Advertisement

No wonder that a once-benevolent world is turning against them, leading to rumors, often unfounded, about their over-the-top lifestyles. Grover, it is said, possesses a multi-crore dining table, a charge that sounded bizarre even before he denied it on Twitter.

Sure, entrepreneurs like Sharma and Grover can claim that the money they spend belongs to them, which gives them the right to do what they wish. That’s only partially true since in the strictest sense, they haven’t really earned the money (since both their companies can be classified by what Value Research’s Dhirendra Kumar memorably terms as CTHNMAPAPNS, which stands for 'company that has never made a profit and probably never shall').