HomeNewsTrendsLifestyleBefore moonlighting, there was freelance journalism but without the debate

Before moonlighting, there was freelance journalism but without the debate

Freelancing gives you an illusion of choice. But the aspiring 'free agent' needs to develop intellectual resources to deliver the desired content and also emotional sinew to cope with the silent treatment.

October 22, 2022 / 11:32 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
(Illustration by Suneesh K)
(Illustration by Suneesh K)

The debate around moonlighting is snowballing into a major issue with corporate honchos forced into casting their vote for or against the phenomenon. Salil Parekh, CEO of Infosys, which recently said dual employment could lead to termination, used the company's quarterly results briefing on October 13 to clarify that it encourages employees to pursue other interests outside the company as long as they seek prior consent.

Viewing the ongoing developments with amusement are freelance journalists, many of whom have been moonlighting for years, negotiating its painful curves of eclecticism and freedom with dollops of dilettantism. Given the low wages they get, many need a side hustle for paying the bills. Others have chosen to go all the way, giving up full-time jobs to serve multiple masters. Indeed, long before the millennials discovered ghosting, journalism already had contributed ghostwriting to the language.

Story continues below Advertisement

Despite being accused of irresponsibility by family and friends, the freelance journalist peddling his wares to all comers, has been an essential feature of the media landscape for as long as it has been around. Their heyday was in the late 1990s and the early years of this century when new publications sprouted overnight. And closed with equal alacrity. Most were mom-and-pop shops that hired only a few staffers permanently and that too for essential functions, while leaning on contributors for the bulk of their content. It worked well for both parties and for that reason it was too good to last.

Soon enough there were more contributors than there was work and the balance of power shifted to the few media outlets that had survived. Rates fell and assignments shrank. The committed freelancers, though, stayed. Freelancing does give you an illusion of choice in that you decide where, when, how and with whom you work. With current technology and the growth of digital media, work-from-anywhere-but-the-office, is in any case, the preferred mode.