HomeNewsTrendsExpert ColumnsBoosting business by mitigating fraud risks

Boosting business by mitigating fraud risks

Fraud has the ability to impact all industries, irrespective of sector, size or location. According to a survey by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), it is estimated that a typical organization loses 5 percent of revenues to fraud. The Indian environment is no different.

August 04, 2016 / 10:51 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

Vivek Aggarwal & Vineet MehtaFraud has a direct impact on a company’s bottom-line. Hypothetically speaking, it acts like a burglar that easily enters the premises due to an open window you had forgotten to close.

Fraud has the ability to impact all industries, irrespective of sector, size or location. According to a survey by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), it is estimated that a typical organization loses 5 percent of revenues to fraud. The Indian environment is no different. A highly fragmented market, numerous middle-men and distortion in price variations across regions makes it vulnerable to fraud. These could give rise to losses; on an average which could potentially affect as much as 10 percent of the total transaction value.

Story continues below Advertisement

The susceptibility quotient

Any fraud occurrence requires opportunity; provided by either weak controls or a lack thereof, which can exploited by perpetrators. If these gaps in processes are not proactively identified and mitigated, exploitation could continue. Furthermore, it has been observed that in most circumstances, a key reason for fraud is weak monitoring within the organization. The following instances highlight how companies view normalcy in outlined procedural measures versus how an aberration to the rule could exploit these situations.

Sr. No. A ‘normal’ situation or transaction When an employee or party defrauds Company
1 An employee submits reimbursement claims and the individual’s supervisor approves the claim Reimbursement claims submitted by the employee belongs to the supervisor
2 A profit sharing arrangement undertaken with another party as per industry practices One party in the profit sharing arrangement misrepresents the figures required for calculating profits
3 A company pays a contractor for contracted employees The contractor in turn short-pays the contracted employees
4 A company pays a distributor his commission for their monthly sales Sales are intentionally booked under different sales channel (where commission is higher) to inflate commissions
5 An employee sends emails to personal webmail accounts Employee could consequentially leak confidential data (i.e. customer data etc.)
6 Customer discounts accounted for in the books of record Discounts listed in the books, however the customers are billed for the full amount

                                                                                                                                This demonstrates that unless effective monitoring controls are in place, the company would not be able to identify the fraudulent transactions in a timely manner.