HomeNewsIndiaDelhi HC refuses to direct TRAI to furnish tapping info to mobile user under RTI Act

Delhi HC refuses to direct TRAI to furnish tapping info to mobile user under RTI Act

Delhi High Court overturns CIC's order for TRAI to disclose information on alleged mobile tapping in RTI proceedings.

December 25, 2023 / 15:48 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Delhi High Court overturns CIC's order for TRAI to disclose alleged phone tapping details under RTI proceedings.
Delhi High Court overturns CIC's order for TRAI to disclose alleged phone tapping details under RTI proceedings.

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order upholding the Central Information Commission’s (CIC) direction to telecom regulator TRAI to collect and furnish information under RTI proceedings about the alleged tapping of a mobile user’s phone.

A bench headed by Justice Vibhu Bakhru allowed an appeal filed by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) against a single-judge bench order and said an act of surveillance is carried out under the government’s directions and in the interest of the country’s sovereignty and integrity, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign states or public order, or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence, and is exempted under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

Story continues below Advertisement

”Any orders passed by the government concerned in relation to interception or tapping or tracking of a phone is passed when the authorised officer is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign states or public order, or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence,” the bench, also comprising Justice Amit Mahajan, said in a recent order.

”In a given case, the disclosure of any such information, therefore, may impede the process of investigation and may be construed to prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, the strategic, scientific and economic interest of the State, relations with foreign states or lead to incitement of an offence, and would therefore be exempted from disclosure under the terms of section 8 of the RTI Act,” the court concluded.