HomeNewsBusinessPersonal FinanceDespite knowing about front running, Franklin Templeton didn’t stop Kudva, says Shriram Subramanian, a corporate governance expert

Despite knowing about front running, Franklin Templeton didn’t stop Kudva, says Shriram Subramanian, a corporate governance expert

The founder and MD of InGovern Research Services says SEBI order has no bearing on the fund manager’s freedom and return maximization. However, fraud and unethical behaviour in the pursuit of return maximization cannot happen.

June 11, 2021 / 22:52 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

In its June 7 order, SEBI stated that Franklin Templeton mutual fund mismanaged its debt funds. It ordered the fund house to pay back investors, through the six wound-up schemes, the investment management fees it had earned since the year 2018. Additionally, it also found its Asia Pacific Distribution head, Vivek Kudva and his family guilty of withdrawing their own funds from the schemes just days before the winding up. In a conversation with Moneycontrol’s Nikhil Walavalkar, Shriram Subramanian, Founder and Managing Director, InGovern Research Services, a proxy advisory firm, says that Vivek Kudva’s and his family’s conduct was wrong.

Franklin Templeton (FT) has been asked to return fund management fees it had earned in the past three odd years. Is there such a precedent anywhere globally? 

Story continues below Advertisement

It is a common global practice for the regulator to impose monetary fines and disgorgement of amounts gained by the regulatory breach or misconduct or fraud. Also, the penalty or fine is usually so high, as to act as a deterrent for other market participants to indulge in such misconduct or fraud.

The Head of FT’s Asia Pacific region, Vivek Kudva, and his family members have been penalized. How do you assess this decision?