MC Explainer: What's all the fuss around RBI's Jan 5 circular on currency-derivatives trading?

ETCDs are bought via exchanges while over-the-counter (OTC) currency derivatives are bought as their name suggests. ETCDs were launched in 2008. The RBI circular had brought the regulatory framework for both derivatives under one master circular.

The deadline for the directives in the January 5 to come into force was April 5. It has now been extended to May 3.

What triggered the outrage?

The exchanges issued a circular to the brokerages on April 1 and the brokerages started contacting their clients, asking them to close their currency-derivative positions if they did not have underlying contracted exposure to currency risk—for example as an importer or an exporter.

Why is that a problem?

A large part of the currency-derivatives market—which is made up of speculators and arbitrageurs—was being asked to close their positions immediately. This was because RBI's directions meant that people could only use the derivatives to hedge exposure to foreign exchange rate risks. Therefore, only hedgers were being allowed to operate in the currency derivative segment.

Since the rest of the traders had only three days (going by the earlier deadline) to close their positions, they were forced to take exit at whatever price they could find. Option premiums even shot up by 100x in some cases and traders had to absorb losses of lakhs of rupees.

Market participants were under the impression that the central bank had implemented this policy out of the blue. But as a later, April 4, 2024, circular from the RBI clarified, "The regulatory framework for ETCDs has remained consistent over the years and that there is no change in the RBI’s policy approach".

Why didn't RBI give more time?

RBI did give enough time. In fact, the central bank had this policy—that currency derivatives can only be used for hedging—since 2020. However, the exchanges had not communicated this to the traders.

Through the January 5, 2024, circular, the RBI had only reiterated its policy and asked the exchanges to inform the users of this regulatory requirement and the deadline by which the requirement must be met.

The circular also said that users who took positions up to $100 million did not have to provide documentary evidence but would have to provide the evidence if asked. While this was always the requirement, it wasn't clearly stated in the earlier circulars.

Market insiders told Moneycontrol that the exchanges were hoping for a rollback of this decision by the RBI and therefore did not tell traders or brokerages to ensure that currency-derivative positions were being taken only as a hedge.

Also read: Exchanges' poor communication and not RBI's circular causing losses in currency-derivatives, say sources

What happened in the following days?

There was not much time left for compliance since the exchanges sent out the circular to brokerages only on April 1, which was just a few days before the earlier deadline of April 5.

Therefore, the brokerages informed their clients that they would need to furnish evidence about underlying foreign exchange rate risk or the brokerages would forcibly square off their positions. Some other brokerages said that they would square off their positions if the clients gave a self-declaration that their currency-derivative positions are against an underlying exposure, without any further evidence.

The latter option only looked better. If clients were tempted to give a false declaration to hold on to their derivative positions, then the clients would have faced serious legal consequences.

What would be the legal consequences of a false declaration?

If positions were being held against the RBI directive, that is, they were being held without an underlying currency-risk exposure, then the clients could be found in violation of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA).

They could then be investigated and penalised by the Enforcement Directorate.

If they gave a false declaration to the brokerages, and the brokerages faced any penalty or financial loss because of this declaration, then the clients could also be liable to compensate the brokerages or pay the fine/penalty themselves.

Did the RBI extend the deadline?

Yes, to May 3. But as currency dealers, traders and brokers told Moneycontrol, the extension was given at the very last minute—on the evening of April 4. By then, many traders had already closed their positions at big losses.

Will the RBI's directive mean the end of ETCDs?

Market insiders believe it would. They said that this segment is kept alive and liquid by speculators, arbitrageurs and hedgers. If only hedgers are allowed, liquidity will come to nearly zero.

Zerodha's co-founder Nithin Kamath tweeted, "The RBI has its own reasons for restricting unhedged currency derivatives, but this means the death of currency derivative trading on stock exchanges by retail traders."