HomeWorldTrump administration to deny US visas to fact-checkers and content moderators

Trump administration to deny US visas to fact-checkers and content moderators

The Trump administration in the US is moving to bar visas for foreign fact-checkers and content-moderation workers, a sharp shift that targets roles long considered essential for online safety. A leaked US State Department memo shows embassies will now screen applicants for any past involvement in “censorship.”

December 08, 2025 / 10:46 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Trump targets fact-checkers in visa ban
Trump targets fact-checkers in visa ban

The Trump administration is preparing to keep foreign fact-checkers and online moderation staff out of the United States, turning a long-running political grievance about “censorship” into formal visa policy. A leaked US State Department memo shows consular officers will now be asked to treat work in these fields as a potential ground for refusal.

According to the directive, issued on December 2 and circulated to US embassies and consulates, visa officers must deny entry to applicants, including H-1B tech workers, journalists and online moderators, who are judged to have been “responsible for, or complicit in, censorship or attempted censorship of protected expression in the United States.”

Story continues below Advertisement

The memo instructs officials to go beyond routine background checks and dig into applicants’ professional histories, LinkedIn pages and public social-media posts. Anyone who has served in trust and safety, misinformation or disinformation teams, compliance, online-safety functions or dedicated fact-checking roles, even at large global platforms, could find their applications delayed or rejected outright.

Supporters of the move claim it protects free speech by keeping “censors” from influencing the American information space. But civil-liberties groups, technology companies and many policy experts say the administration is deliberately blurring the line between political disagreement and genuine online-safety work. For most platforms, they argue, content moderation is used to tackle threats such as incitement to violence, coordinated harassment or organised disinformation, not to silence legitimate opinions.