HomeNewsTrendsFeatures100 years of 'Ulysses': How to read James Joyce's experimental novel

100 years of 'Ulysses': How to read James Joyce's experimental novel

The Irish writer’s modernist masterpiece was published 100 years ago. Since then, many print, digital and audio guides have tried to make it more accessible.

January 29, 2022 / 09:35 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
A first edition copy of 'Ulysses' by James Joyce, at the State Library of New South Wales (Image: Geoffrey Barker via Wikimedia Commons 4.0)
A first edition copy of 'Ulysses' by James Joyce, at the State Library of New South Wales (Image: Geoffrey Barker via Wikimedia Commons 4.0)

One hundred years ago on February 2, a book was published that, according to its author, contained so many enigmas and puzzles that “it will keep the professors busy for centuries arguing over what I meant”. So far, James Joyce has been proved right about Ulysses. It’s surrounded by a thicket of guides, essays, and treatises that have shored up the modernist masterpiece’s reputation for obscurity.

It’s certainly no beach read. However, as critic John Mullan has pointed out, unravelling Joyce’s enigmas and puzzles with the help of a guide is part of the pleasure of going through the stately, plump volume. Even Judge Woolsey, as part of his 1933 verdict which held that Ulysses was not obscene and could be admitted into the United States, said that to understand Joyce’s work, “it is advisable to read a number of other books which have now become its satellites”.

Story continues below Advertisement

Among the first of these satellites was Stuart Gilbert’s formidable James Joyce’s Ulysses: A Study. Originally published in 1930, it has the distinction of being written after several discussions with Joyce himself. As Gilbert wrote in his introduction, he consulted Joyce on every doubtful point, “ascertaining from him the exact associations he had in mind when using proper names, truncated phrases or peculiar words”.

Much of the way Ulysses is understood nowadays owes a lot to Gilbert’s book: the Homeric parallels and the patterning of sections after colours and body parts, for example. For the lay reader, however, Gilbert can be dense. Nabokov, too, was not a fan. In a lecture to students at Cornell, he called him a “pseudo-scholarly bore” who was “misled by a tongue-in-cheek list compiled by Joyce himself”.