HomeNewsOpinionClimate Finance Regulation: Seek inter-regulatory coordination and consensus on taxonomy

Climate Finance Regulation: Seek inter-regulatory coordination and consensus on taxonomy

As we consider the scale and breadth of the problem of climate change, central banks and financial regulators are important partners on the road to mitigation and adaptation

June 07, 2023 / 17:03 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Climate Finance
Climate change requires polycentric approaches by multiple sectors and regulatory authorities.

Climate change, a defining challenge of our times, is a ‘collective action problem’ – requiring collaborative action between individuals, groups and nations, yet such coordination is elusive given misaligned incentives. It is a misnomer that climate action contracts economic growth – research indicates the contrary. Focussing on Net Zero could add $371 billion and four percentage points to India’s GDP, creating 12 million new jobs by 2030 according to a report by the Asia Society Policy Institute, relying on modelling by Cambridge Econometrics. A World Economic Forum-AT Kearney report goes further, stating that India’s transition to a net-zero economy could create over 50 million jobs and contribute more than $1 trillion in economic impact by 2030 and 15 trillion by 2070.

Climate change requires polycentric approaches (as Elinor Ostrom, the economies Nobel laureate has stated in papers) by multiple sectors and regulatory authorities. The financial system is not insulated from climate risk which impacts financial stability. Financial regulation enables investment to be directed towards green sectors and away from brown industries. Central banks and banking regulators must be cognizant of financial stability risks caused by climate change, as well as channelling credit in ways that mitigate it.

Story continues below Advertisement

Lack Of Legal Mandate

It could be argued that central banks do not have an explicit legal mandate to address climate change since their primary objective is to secure monetary stability, or they should simply coordinate with governments’ climate policies. Research by multilateral organisations like International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements and Financial Stability Board has reaffirmed the need for financial regulators to decisively address climate change. Several regulators have centred climate action in their regulatory mandate. The Bank of England, which was previously accused of over-stepping its mandate by regulating for climate action, recently as part of a recent future regulatory review framework, specifically established a smarter regulatory framework responsive to emerging threats, including sustainable finance. Jurisdictions like Russia, Malaysia, Singapore, Nepal, Philippines, and South Africa among others specifically recognise sustainable economic growth in the mandates of their respective central banks.