HomeNewsIndia‘Judges hitting sixes before retiring’: SC flags ‘unfortunate trend’, questions last moment orders

‘Judges hitting sixes before retiring’: SC flags ‘unfortunate trend’, questions last moment orders

The remarks came while the bench led by the Chief Justice of India was hearing a petition filed by a principal district judge from Madhya Pradesh, who has challenged his suspension barely 10 days before his scheduled retirement.

December 18, 2025 / 11:32 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Supreme Court, Supreme Court news, Supreme Court latest news, Supreme Court observation, Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant
The bench agreed in principle, noting that disciplinary action cannot ordinarily be initiated against a judicial officer for passing erroneous orders

In an unusual and candid observation on alleged corruption within the judiciary, a Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Wednesday flagged what it described as a growing pattern of judges passing a flurry of orders for extraneous reasons just before retirement, a Times of India report said on Thursday.

The remarks came while the court was hearing a petition filed by a principal district judge from Madhya Pradesh, who has challenged his suspension barely 10 days before his scheduled retirement. The suspension was reportedly linked to two judicial orders passed by him shortly before he was due to superannuate, The Times of India said.

Story continues below Advertisement

During the hearing, the bench comprising CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that the petitioner appeared to have become unusually active in issuing orders on the eve of retirement. "Petitioner just before retirement started hitting sixes. It is an unfortunate trend. I do not want to elaborate on it," the CJI remarked, as quoted by The Times of India.

Senior advocate Vipin Sanghi, appearing for the judicial officer, told the court that the petitioner had an otherwise stellar service record, backed by consistently high ratings in his annual confidential reports, The Times of India reported. Sanghi pointed out that the officer was due to retire on November 30 but was suspended on November 19, ostensibly over two judicial orders.