RBS investor group accepts offer to end lawsuit over 2008 cash call

The deal will cost state-owned RBS around 200 million pounds ($257 million), but spare it the embarrassment of having the lowest point in its near 300 year history raked over in court.

Goodwin, nicknamed "Fred the Shred" for his cost-cutting abilities and abrasive management style, was first feted and knighted before RBS's near collapse at the height of the credit crisis prompted the world's biggest bank bailout. Shareholders lost around 80 percent of their investments.

Sources familiar with the case said some shareholders within the group wanted to pursue the case against the bank, if they could find funding. But the letter indicated that investors representing the necessary threshold of 70 percent of the value of the claim for acceptance had been reached, one source said. A formal announcement on behalf of the group, which includes around 9,000 retail and 20 institutional investors and has been beset by internal wrangles, changing legal teams and questions over its funding and management structure, is expected later on Monday or Tuesday. RBS declined to comment.

Raising the stakes

Investors representing 87 percent of the claim had already settled their case after RBS put around 800 million pounds on the table last year.

In a bid to avoid a trial, Edinburgh-based RBS almost doubled its initial offer to 82 pence per share, from 43.1 pence per share, last weekend.

A deal had been expected. Jonathan Nash, a lawyer for the claimant group, told London's High Court last week that the majority of shareholders were willing to accept RBS's offer and there was a "good prospect" of a final settlement.

RBS's final offer remains a fraction of the 200 to 230 pence per share that shareholders bought RBS shares at in 2008 and denies investors the prospect of seeing Goodwin cross-examined in court. Goodwin, who left RBS a wealthy man, became a symbol of banker recklessness and greed during the credit crisis.

But lawyers have said the case could have dragged on for years before a court established both whether RBS was liable for investor losses and subsequently quantified any damages.

The RBoS Shareholder Action Group also confirmed that a claimant funding the case had accepted the offer and was no longer willing to pay for further litigation. All institutional investors are also backing the offer, which would raise the costs for remaining claimants if they were to proceed, it said.

Shareholders were told that around 40-45 percent of the proceeds of the settlement would be deducted for legal and other costs. But the group added in the letter there were "many variables which may impact the level of the costs."

RBS investors, including thousands of current and former RBS employees, had alleged the bank's former executives deliberately hid its over-stretched finances and failed to disclose that the regulator had ordered it to raise cash when asking investors to stump up a then-record 12 billion pounds in 2008.

Just months later, the government was forced to step in with a 45.8 billion pound taxpayer-funded bailout.

RBS, which remains more than 70 percent state-owned, denies any wrongdoing and said its former bosses did not act illegally.

The bank has racked up nine consecutive years of losses totalling 58 billion pounds since the credit crisis, largely blaming "legacy issues" during Goodwin's tenure.