HomeNewsBusinessEconomyWhy energy & subsidy reforms are more important than GST?

Why energy & subsidy reforms are more important than GST?

Arun Jaitley's repeated batting for a flawed GST is worrisome. GST is a good tax only to the extent it is an all-encompassing impost that replaces all existing state and central taxes. But the GST now planned has too many flaws, and too many exclusions.

September 23, 2015 / 15:31 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

R JagannathanFirstpost.com

The finance minister, now on a tour of south-east Asia to drum up investments for India, made his government’s focus clear. Among those he mentioned as his priorities, ease of business clearly is a no-brainer. That has to continue. He also talked about resolving tax disputes with the likes of Vodafone, Cairn and Shell – all victims of the retrospective tax legislation of the UPA – and speeding up the implementation of the goods and services tax (GST) and reining in the fiscal deficit, which has been pencilled in for 3.9 percent of GDP this year.Actually, Arun Jaitley needs to recalibrate his priorities. The easiest way to end tax disputes is to remove that abomination inserted into tax law by Pranab Mukherjee after the government lost the Vodafone case in the Supreme Court. While it is not my case that Vodafone did not try to evade Indian taxes by using some loopholes in the law, such disputes have to find closure at some point – and a Supreme Court verdict was the right place to end them. The retrospective tax law clarification inserted by Mukherjee to make things absolutely clear should have been avoided. It only made India a riskier place to invest in.Jaitley should rewrite the law to make it only prospective in nature. He does not need the support of the Congress or anyone else to change this law, and he must do it pronto. In fact, his predecessor P Chidambaram has criticised him for not doing so, and so Jaitley has good reason to go ahead and do it in the winter session of parliament and not wait for the next budget in February 2016.On his other two priorities, too, Jaitley needs to do a rethink.His repeated batting for a flawed GST is worrisome. GST is a good tax only to the extent it is an all-encompassing impost that replaces all existing state and central taxes. But the GST now planned has too many flaws, and too many exclusions (alcohol, petroleum, and some other municipal levies). Moreover, the states are still uncomfortable with giving up their revenue flexibility by signing on to GST.Jaitley seems to have accepted the general urgings of business claiming GST as reform. But this would not be true. A GST full of exclusions and which also includes an additional tax of 1 percent on inter-state sales will make the actual revenue-neutral rate very high, probably above 20 percent, and hit the most productive sector (services) the hardest. A bad GST is not reform.
Jaitley’s other priority - his focus on the fiscal deficit - is not wrong, but what matters here is the emphasis. In a world where deflation is the real worry and Indian exports are dropping sharply, the emphasis has to be on domestic growth, and this calls for a more nuanced approach to the fiscal deficit.

Story continues below Advertisement

This should be his mantra: a focus on the quality of the fiscal deficit, and not on the headline number of 3.9 percent of GDP that he promised in the budget.

Improving the quality of the fiscal deficit means he must try and cut out unproductive expenditure, and boost productive expenditure. Cutting the overall size of the fiscal deficit is less important than cutting out the wrong expenses and boosting the right ones.