HomeWorldTrump’s AI czar David Sacks insists recent layoffs aren’t driven by AI

Trump’s AI czar David Sacks insists recent layoffs aren’t driven by AI

Fears that artificial intelligence is behind layoffs, as companies cut jobs around the world, are greatly exaggerated, says David Sacks. He argues human oversight remains essential and that AI isn’t the real culprit behind widespread job cuts.

December 09, 2025 / 14:13 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Sacks dismisses AI-driven layoff panic
Sacks dismisses AI-driven layoff panic

The fresh wave of layoffs at tech giants has whipped up fears that jobs are being wiped out because of AI-driven automation. In response, David Sacks who was appointed by Donald Trump to oversee AI and crypto policy challenged that narrative: much of the panic about lost jobs to AI is overblown. While AI tools grow increasingly powerful and common, many tasks require human judgment, prompting, and verification, Sacks says. And those are jobs AI cannot replace.

In an X post, Sacks said, “AI models still need to be prompted and verified, often iteratively, to drive business value,” and dismissed the notion that there was going to be some type of near-term apocalypse of mass unemployment via artificial intelligence.

Story continues below Advertisement

Recent data tends to support Sacks' stance. A November 2025 survey by Goldman Sachs found that only about 11 percent of companies it polled were actively using AI as justification for layoffs. Instead, the majority are still using AI as a productivity booster rather than a cost-cutting substitute for staff. The survey points out that firms across industries are more likely to deploy AI to boost revenue or make operations more efficient than to pare headcount.

This even includes major corporate layoffs, such as those announced by Amazon, which have been officially framed by leadership in terms of reorganisations for agility rather than the result of automation or AI-driven transformation. The CEO of Amazon recently came forward to say that the job cuts are not financial or AI-driven but part of a broader effort to restructure the corporate workforce.