HomeNewsTrendsFeaturesWhen economists’ numbers don’t add up

When economists’ numbers don’t add up

Forecasts are the bread and butter of economists, the kind of thing they do in their sleep. Indeed in hindsight, many recent forecasts appear to have been made while they were grabbing a few precious winks.

October 10, 2021 / 07:55 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Illustration by Suneesh K.
Illustration by Suneesh K.

With oil prices at a steep $80 a barrel, up from the sub $20 last year, there is a case for hauling up all those pundits who confidently predicted the end of the oil cycle at that time. On March 8, 2020, oil prices plunged 24 per cent to post their worst day in nearly three decades after OPEC, the worldwide consortium of big oil producers, failed to reach a deal on production cysts in the light of demand shrinkage following the Covid-19 lockdowns. This sparked a price war that ultimately saw prices fall to multi-year lows, even briefly entering negative territory.

What followed was a series of obituaries on the demise of big oil with prices headed deep South and forecasted to stay there. Instead a surge in demand as economies emerge from Covid-19, along with severe supply shortages, has led to crude prices climbing to a three-year high.

Story continues below Advertisement

That means, several forecasters who last year confidently predicted “the end of oil”, have been proved wrong. And not for the first time.

Forecasts are the bread and butter of economists, the kind of thing they do in their sleep. Of course, in hindsight many recent forecasts by learned economists do appear to have been made while they were grabbing a few precious winks. In 1992, for instance, MIT professor and well-known economist Lester Thurow in his book Head to Head, confidently predicted that China “will not have a big impact on the world economy in the first half of the 21st century.” China is today the world’s second-largest economy with a 15 per cent share of world trade.