HomeNewsOpinionWhy banning a borderless industry will only hurt India

Why banning a borderless industry will only hurt India

The dangers of online money games and its implications on a society are etched in India’s history, but to push through a policy that could wipe out an entire industry overnight has deeper ramifications for Indian innovation and entrepreneurship

August 20, 2025 / 18:46 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw (file image)
IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw (file image)

The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, passed in the Lok Sabha to regulate the online gaming sector and in the process banning online money games citing social, psychological, economic and privacy-related impacts of such games is well intentioned but in its zest to protect, it could well turn out to be a red flag for entrepreneurs in the country. It’s not so much about the ban but how it’s been brought about – with little or no consultation with the key stakeholders involved. An internet-based industry, online gaming providers can be established anywhere in the world thus raising questions on the states’  ability to effectively ban this borderless industry.

There are several options that could have been considered for a more nuanced approach to what is considered a grey industry world-wide. Social, economic and moral implications of online money gaming have weighed heavy on economies and cultures , however,  developed countries have taken a nuanced view of this industry.

Story continues below Advertisement

In the European Union for instance, regulations come with product restrictions or state monoplies. France, for example, allows online sports betting and poker but not online casino games. Poland is a state monopoly – state operates online casino games while private operators are restricted to online betting and are subject to high taxes and strict regulatory oversight. In Austria, online betting is regulated and licensed at a state level. Operators in EU have to navigate licensing rules, high tax rates, strict advertising laws. The United Kingdom has taken a view of encouraging companies to establish operations.

Political, moral and cultural optics of the ban aside, economics of a ban are rarely good.