HomeNewsOpinionOPINION | Manual Scavenging: When the Supreme Court saw its own order being violated at its own gate

OPINION | Manual Scavenging: When the Supreme Court saw its own order being violated at its own gate

Laws, judgments, and penalties can only go so far unless accompanied by a strong administrative will to eradicate this inhuman practice once and for all. The sight of a worker entering a sewer outside the Supreme Court is not just a failure of governance; it is a collective failure of conscience

October 15, 2025 / 15:44 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Manual Scavenging
Even more than two decades after the first law prohibiting manual scavenging was enacted, manual scavenging continued to persist across the country.

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees every individual the right to life and personal liberty. Over the years, the Supreme Court has, through a series of landmark judgments, expanded the scope of this right far beyond mere physical existence or survival. It has consistently emphasised that the right to life is not limited to just living, but to living with human dignity, encompassing all those conditions and elements that make life meaningful, complete, and worth living.

In this way, dignity has become the touchstone for interpreting Article 21. The Court’s evolving jurisprudence has extended this concept to affirm that dignity is essential not only to live but also to die with respect and grace — thereby recognising the right to die with dignity as an extension of the right to life itself.

Story continues below Advertisement

However, there remain instances where the State fails in its constitutional duty. And, it becomes glaringly evident when a ‘manual scavenger’ is forced to clean human excreta from latrines, open drains, or pits, in many cases with mere safety equipment, sometimes with bare hands. And die from inhaling toxic gases.

Two laws, no effect