HomeNewsIndia'Disclosures will jeopardise ..': Supreme Court on revealing details of CBI probe in Kolkata rape-murder case

'Disclosures will jeopardise ..': Supreme Court on revealing details of CBI probe in Kolkata rape-murder case

The apex court disapproved of the Bengal government's policy restricting women doctors from night shifts, as well as directed Wikipedia to remove any content identifying the victim in connection with the case.

September 17, 2024 / 14:41 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
The bench found the details provided by the CBI in its latest status report to be “disturbing” and raised concerns about evidence collection.
The bench found the details provided by the CBI in its latest status report to be “disturbing” and raised concerns about evidence collection.

Revealing details of the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) probe into the rape and murder of a young doctor at a Kolkata hospital could jeopardise the ongoing investigation, noted the Supreme Court on September 17. Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, after reviewing a status report submitted by the CBI, cautioned against making any detailed comments that could tip off likely suspects.

"Disclosing the CBI’s investigative leads today could jeopardise the process and give suspects the opportunity to cover their tracks," CJI Chandrachud stated, referring to the arrest of the station house officer (SHO) of Tala police station, who was detained in connection with the case.

Story continues below Advertisement

The CJI noted that the concerns raised during previous hearings had been addressed in the CBI’s status report and noted that the court would refrain from revealing specific details to protect the integrity of the investigation. “We’ve reviewed the status report and observed that the CBI is now focusing on uncovering the full truth of what transpired,” he said. He added that the five-day delay before the CBI took charge of the case posed challenges, with concerns that the crime scene might have been altered to destroy evidence.

The court found the details provided by the CBI in its latest status report to be “disturbing” and raised concerns about evidence collection. The CBI counsel stated that two separate lists were needed for the items seized from the crime scene. The bench questioned why key evidence, such as the victim’s jeans and undergarments, had not been taken earlier, stressing the importance of proper sample testing.