Moneycontrol
HomeNewsBusinessPersonal FinanceLending on P2P platforms: A risky proposition; not an investment
Trending Topics

Lending on P2P platforms: A risky proposition; not an investment

Typically, people who borrow on P2P platforms are those who don’t get loans from banks because of a weak credit profile or very low income

February 11, 2020 / 14:36 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

In December 2019, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) allowed lending on peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms to the tune of Rs 50 lakh, up from the previous limit of Rs 10 lakh. That’s good news for those who borrow from P2P platforms, but should lenders jump to lend more? Mumbai-based Surendra Mistry, 31, would disagree, in all likelihood.

Having heard some positive reviews of how one can “earn” some extra bucks by lending online at higher rates, Surendra decided to try his hand at lending money on a P2P platform. That was in November 2018. Tempted, he withdrew Rs 1 lakh from his fixed deposits that had just matured and used the money to lend to borrowers who came with a low-credit rating of between ‘D’ and ‘F.’ P2P platforms, typically, profile and then rate borrowers depending on their repayment and borrowing history, bank balance, income levels and so on. A borrower with an ‘A’ rating  is considered to be the best of the lot; amounts lent to such borrowers fetch the lenders around 10 to 12 per cent. A person with anF’ grade (known to be of the weakest credit profile) gets to borrow at a rate of around 25 per cent. Says Surendra, “With the greed to earn higher returns from lending on P2P platforms, I decided to lend to lower-risk-grade borrowers.”

Story continues below Advertisement

The lending amount Rs 1 lakh was divided among 20 borrowers. “In the initial two months I received the monthly instalments on a specific date assigned by the platform. However, afterwards, some of the borrowers started postponing instalments and others defaulted for a couple of months,” says Surendra. Within a span of one year, he could recover a meagre Rs 20,000. This amount included principal and interest. He couldn’t recover remaining amount.

Surendra made his first mistake of looking at lending on P2P platforms as an ‘investment’ that earns ‘returns.’ His second was he that he deployed his FD proceeds – a conservative investment – and deployed them into a high-risk gamble called P2P lending. His third mistake was that he did not do proper due diligence of his borrowers. His move had ‘risk’ written all over it.