HomeNewsBusinessPersonal FinanceAyush hospitalisation and insurance: Why claims get rejected and how to improve your chances

Ayush hospitalisation and insurance: Why claims get rejected and how to improve your chances

A practical guide to understanding ayush coverage in health policies, why ayurvedic in-patient claims often face extra scrutiny, and what you can do to improve your chances of getting paid.

December 12, 2025 / 16:01 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Representative image
Representative image

For many Indians, serious illness or chronic pain still sends them to an ayurvedic hospital rather than a modern multi-speciality facility. On paper, health insurance has caught up with this reality. Most standard policies now promise coverage for ayush treatments, including ayurveda, as long as you are admitted as an in-patient. Yet when the bill goes in, many families discover that
ayurvedic hospitalisation claims face more questions, more paperwork and more rejections than regular allopathic admissions. Understanding why this happens and how the rules actually work is the first step to avoiding nasty surprises.

Why ayurvedic hospitalisation faces more scrutiny

Story continues below Advertisement

Insurers like clear, standardised treatment protocols. Allopathic hospital bills usually fit that template. Ayurvedic hospitalisation, in contrast, often looks unfamiliar to claims teams. Packages are built around therapies, oils and panchakarma procedures rather than surgeries and scans. That alone makes internal reviewers more cautious. There are also structural reasons. Many policies still restrict ayush coverage to in patient care, with a minimum 24-hour admission, and only in recognised ayush hospitals. If the facility is more like a wellness retreat than a registered
hospital, or if the insurer decides that the stay was largely for rejuvenation rather than medical treatment, the claim can be questioned or denied.

Documentation standards also tend to be weaker in smaller ayurvedic centres, which gives companies an easy technical ground to push back.