HomeNewsBusinessMarketsRohit Salgaocar moves SAT as SEBI denies cross examination of Ketan Parekh in front-running probe

MC EXCLUSIVE Rohit Salgaocar moves SAT as SEBI denies cross examination of Ketan Parekh in front-running probe

Salgaocar’s petition also says that SEBI’s interim order has damaged his reputation and is threatening his livelihood. Matter is pending before SAT for hearing.

November 14, 2025 / 14:25 IST
Story continues below Advertisement
Rohit Salgaocar moves SAT as SEBI denies cross examination of Ketan Parekh in front-funning probe
Rohit Salgaocar moves SAT as SEBI denies cross examination of Ketan Parekh in front-funning probe

Rohit Salgaocar, a Singapore citizen whom Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has accused of front running trades of big clients in connivance with controversial stock broker Ketan Parekh, has approached the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). The move comes after SEBI denied his request to cross-examine Ketan Parekh. Front-running, which involves trading ahead of large client orders to profit from predictable price movement, is a serious market offence under securities law. The demand to cross examine Parekh is surprising as SEBI has accused both to be involved in front running trades and working in close co-ordination.

According to court documents accessed by Moneycontrol, Salgaocar sought the opportunity to question Parekh on grounds that the latter’s statements formed part of the investigative chain relied upon by SEBI. Salgaocar in his plea argued that without cross-examination, he would be denied a fair chance to contest claims that he engaged in front running activity through a network of accounts and access to non-public information (NPI) of large foreign clients’ trades.

Story continues below Advertisement

Salgaocar’s plea in SAT, said “Once the statement has formed part of the evidentiary record and has been adverted to in the show-cause proceedings, the Appellant is entitled to test its veracity by cross-examination. Denial of this right vitiates the proceedings”. The plea further stated, “denying the Appellant's request to cross-examine Ketan Parekh violates principles of natural justice, as his statement was recorded and relied upon by SEBI in the SCN, for drawing adverse inferences against the Appellant. This rejection is particularly grave and serious given the existing and potential adverse civil consequences from SEBI's ex-parte directions”.

Salgaocar denies front running allegations