Moneycontrol
HomeNewsBusinessIndia GDP: Are private forecasters taking a shot in the dark?
Trending Topics

India GDP: Are private forecasters taking a shot in the dark?

There is a great deal of uncertainty at this stage on the COVID-19 economic fallout. The future course that the Indian economy will take highly depends on the fiscal response the government will adopt and the extent of the virus infections.

April 15, 2020 / 13:33 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

On Tuesday, immediately after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the extension of the nationwide lockdown till May 3, private forecasters and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) rushed to cut India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) projections. It almost appeared like a competition on which agency dishes out the most pessimistic projection first. All this when the real economic impact of the COVID-19 outbreak is still a big source of uncertainty for governments and central banks across the world.

The first downward revision from Barclays emerging markets research has cut India’s calendar year 2020 GDP forecast to zero from 2.5 percent earlier. This was followed by Icra. The agency went one step further to predict a possible contraction (negative growth) in GDP to negative one percent in FY21. Then came Nomura which announced a likely contraction in growth at -0.5 percent in India GDP in 2020.

Story continues below Advertisement

While private forecasters had a field day in downgrading India growth predictions, the IMF forecast appeared to be the most perplexing one. The Fund cut the growth projection for the fiscal year 2021 to 1.9 percent but said next fiscal year, the growth could rebound to 7.4 percent. Even after factoring in the base effect, such a prediction showing a sharp reversal, that too when the COVID-19 fight is still halfway, looked confusing.

Question is how did these agencies that have predicted zero to negative growth for India citing coronavirus, assess the COVID-19 economic impact already? Even during the ‘normal’ times, these agencies, including IMF, have got their predictions far off the mark often. The predictions run a greater risk at this stage given the uncertainty on the COVID-19 situation.


One can argue that the response isn’t adequate. The economy could be pushed to a stalemate if follow-up actions do not come in the extended lockdown phase. In the post-lockdown phase, lack of labour availability and likely reluctance of consumers to step out to buy goods and services (especially in services, tourism sectors) could delay the business recovery. The recent RBI industrial outlook surveys and consumer confidence surveys indeed point towards a grim economic outlook ahead.

But the key point here is that everything depends on how soon India contains the virus spread. The fact is that there is a great deal of uncertainty at this stage on the COVID-19 economic fallout. The future course that the Indian economy will take highly depends on the fiscal response the government will adopt and the extent of the virus infections. This is why the drastic cuts in GDP forecasts look premature.

"We believe it is still hard to make a forecast given that we do not know if the shutdown will be extended further post May 3 or not. But the IMF’s forecast is still quite indicative of what the picture could be, " rating agency Care said in a note on Wednesday.
How accurate these predictions can be?

A look at the IMF’s GDP predictions over the last one year wouldn’t inspire much confidence to an observer in terms of accuracy of predictions. Consider this: In January 2019, the IMF predicted that India’s GDP, for FY2020, will grow at 7.5 percent. This was revised down to 7.3 percent in April, further to 7 percent in July, 6.1 percent in October and finally to 4.8 percent in January 2020. In other words, IMF’s chief economist Gita Gopinath, who was bullish on India in January 2019, was of a pessimistic view on India, all in a year.

COVID-19 Vaccine
Frequently Asked Questions

View more

How does a vaccine work?

A vaccine works by mimicking a natural infection. A vaccine not only induces immune response to protect people from any future COVID-19 infection, but also helps quickly build herd immunity to put an end to the pandemic. Herd immunity occurs when a sufficient percentage of a population becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. The good news is that SARS-CoV-2 virus has been fairly stable, which increases the viability of a vaccine.

How many types of vaccines are there?

There are broadly four types of vaccine — one, a vaccine based on the whole virus (this could be either inactivated, or an attenuated [weakened] virus vaccine); two, a non-replicating viral vector vaccine that uses a benign virus as vector that carries the antigen of SARS-CoV; three, nucleic-acid vaccines that have genetic material like DNA and RNA of antigens like spike protein given to a person, helping human cells decode genetic material and produce the vaccine; and four, protein subunit vaccine wherein the recombinant proteins of SARS-COV-2 along with an adjuvant (booster) is given as a vaccine.

What does it take to develop a vaccine of this kind?

Vaccine development is a long, complex process. Unlike drugs that are given to people with a diseased, vaccines are given to healthy people and also vulnerable sections such as children, pregnant women and the elderly. So rigorous tests are compulsory. History says that the fastest time it took to develop a vaccine is five years, but it usually takes double or sometimes triple that time.
View more
+ Show