HomeNewsBusinessEconomyTax experts discuss implications of multiple GST rates

Tax experts discuss implications of multiple GST rates

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council headed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Tuesday discussed multiple tax rates under the new tax regime.

October 18, 2016 / 21:54 IST
Story continues below Advertisement

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 video.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council headed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Tuesday discussed multiple tax rates under the new tax regime.
A four-slab structure of 6, 12, 18 and 26 percent with a cess on the highest band for ultra-luxury and demerit items like tobacco being levied was discussed. Post the meet, Finance minister Arun Jaitley said all had agreed on a formula to compensate states in case of a revenue loss after moving to the new system. Legal experts Harishanker Subramaniam, Partner & National Leader - Indirect Tax, EY, Pratik Jain, Leader - Indirect Tax, PWC and Dinesh Kanabar, CEO, Dhruva Advisors discussed the implications of this multiple rates and compensation formula in an interview to CNBC-TV18’s Shereen Bhan.

According to Jain, multiple tax rate is fine but the only risk is government would be tempted to have many products under this 26 percent rate, which could make it a revenue neutral rate. Therefore, there is a need for clarity on which products would fall under this category.

Story continues below Advertisement

Voicing the same fears, Subramaniam says multiple rate is fine, but multiple rates with so many variation is not going to be good. "If 26 percent is a peak rate then the challenge is there will be a temptation to push more and more rates to 26 percent."

According to Kanabar too, if the gap between 18 percent and 26 percent is small, the attempt will be to push more and more items towards 26 percent.

Below is the verbatim transcript of panel discussion to Shereen Bhan on CNBC-TV18. Q: Now you have more information from the Kerala Finance Minister on what was the proposal that was presented, your quick response? Kanabar: Two quick things what you mention is that in computing what should be the revenues that will accrue to the states for 2017-18 compared to 2016-17, a growth rate of 14 percent on a tax basis has been assumed, which I think is a significant step forward because then you know what is it that will be the deficit if the revenues which were budgeted are not collected that is a very important step, but otherwise really lot will depend on what comes up tomorrow because ultimately the key agenda before the council is to determine the rates and we heard the divergence of views out there, what the Kerala finance minister believes and I am sure the other finance ministers will have their pushes and pulls. Q: On the back of what you heard so far it doesn’t seem like we are getting closer to finalising on that 18 percent number? Jain: The way I read this as that we are moving towards multiple rates so we are moving away from 12 percent and 18 percent, but we are moving towards 4-5 slabs which is 6, 12, 18 and 26 percent. We did not hear a 40 percent rate which was being talked about in the chief economic advisor report on aerated beverages and luxury cars etc, that could come down to 26 percent. I am happy with that I think two rate structure was not going to work in India to start with - - multiple rate is fine. Six percent lower category is also a welcome move because a lot of food products if you move the rate to 12 percent could have been highly inflationary so that is good. The only risk that I see in this multiple rate structure is that if you are talking about 26 percent rate - - the temptation of the government could be to have many products under this 26 percent and therefore 26 percent in that sense could become a revenue neutral rate, which we don’t want. We want a clarity that which are the products which falls under this 26 percent, that is very crucial for us to understand. The other point was that on additional revenue that central government is talking about by way of cess etc is being discussed and that is something which any industry doesn’t want, they want any cesses to apply under GST, because the understanding till now have been that all the cesses and surcharges will go away and tax will be a fairly simple structure.