The University Grants Commission (UGC) has released draft regulations that have drawn mixed reactions among academics, particularly removing the 10% cap on contractual faculty appointments. While the UGC claims this move aims to provide "flexibility" in the recruitment process, many fear it will exacerbate existing issues and pave the way for widespread exploitation of academic labor.
The 2018 regulations limited contractual appointments to 10% of an institution's total faculty positions. However, the latest draft removes this cap, raising serious concerns about the erosion of job security for academics. With increased reliance on contractual positions, faculty members may face constant uncertainty, impacting their research productivity, mental well-being, and overall career development.
Many argue that this move could lead to the normalisation of precarious employment in higher education institutions. Contractual positions often offer lower salaries, limited benefits, and lack of job security, potentially leading to the exploitation of academic labor.
Furthermore, the removal of the cap on contractual appointments, coupled with the potential for increased political interference in permanent faculty recruitment, could create a system where institutions prioritise hiring individuals who align with their interests, regardless of their academic qualifications or research contributions. This could lead to a decline in academic standards and stifle intellectual freedom.
"Permanent posts are already being politically recruited," says one researcher on LinkedIn. "Promoting contractual positions while easing permanent recruitment processes could further encourage corruption and politically motivated hiring. Institutions may delay appointments indefinitely, waiting to offer positions to individuals who align with their interests. They are in no rush to recruit because it saves money and keeps contractual recruits constantly on edge."
Contractual faculty members often live with the constant fear of job loss, impacting their ability to focus on research and teaching. This precarious employment situation can have a detrimental impact on their mental health and overall well-being.
The UGC's draft regulations have raised serious concerns about the future of higher education in India. It is crucial to address these concerns and ensure that any changes to faculty recruitment policies prioritize academic integrity, job security, and the well-being of faculty members.
UGC Seeks Input on 2025 Draft Guidelines
The University Grants Commission (UGC) has issued a call for public feedback on its proposed draft guidelines for faculty appointments and promotions. The 2025 draft regulations aim to introduce greater flexibility in faculty recruitment processes, emphasizing inclusivity and a holistic evaluation approach. These proposed changes align with the vision outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. However, the extent to which these reforms will address the concerns and expectations of the academic community remains to be seen.
Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!
