Payments allowed
The court said Google may keep making payments to Apple for search distribution, with Apple continuing to earn an estimated $20 billion annually. A complete ban was avoided after concerns that such a move would cause “crippling” harm to partners and consumers.
No exclusivity
Google cannot sign exclusive contracts with Apple or any other distribution partner. This ensures rival search engines have at least some access to users, even if Google remains the dominant option.
Data sharing mandate
In a significant win for the DOJ, Google must now share certain data with competitors. This includes information on how search results are ranked and surfaced — a requirement designed to level the playing field for smaller search engines.
Rejected break-up demands
The judge dismissed the DOJ’s calls for Google to sell off Chrome or Android, calling such remedies disproportionate. That spares Google from a forced structural shake-up for now.
Appeal on the horizon
Google has indicated it will appeal aspects of the ruling, particularly the data-sharing mandate, which the company views as an overreach. The legal tussle over how to regulate Google’s search monopoly is far from over.
Discover the latest Business News, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!